arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2602.21763cs.CL
收藏

通过LLMs生成的自然语言解释提升隐含话语关系识别

Improving Implicit Discourse Relation Recognition with Natural Language Explanations from LLMs

Heng Wang, Changxing Wu

AI总结:

本文通过利用LLMs生成的自然语言解释提升隐含话语关系识别的性能和可解释性。

摘要:

隐含话语关系识别(IDRR)仍是一个具有挑战性的任务,因为在没有显式话语标记的情况下需要深入的语义理解。进一步的限制是现有方法仅预测关系而没有提供任何支持性解释。最近大型语言模型(LLMs)的进步表明在深度语言理解和自然语言解释生成方面具有强大的推理能力。在本工作中,我们提出了一种简单而有效的途径,将LLMs的推理能力蒸馏到轻量级IDRR模型中,以提高性能和可解释性。具体来说,我们首先提示LLM为每个训练实例生成解释,条件于其黄金标签。然后,我们引入了一个新的分类-生成框架,联合执行关系预测和解释生成,并通过LLM生成的解释进行额外监督。我们的框架具有即插即用的特点,能够轻松集成到大多数现有IDRR模型中。在PDTB上的实验结果表明,我们的方法显著提高了IDRR性能,而人类评估进一步证实生成的解释增强了模型的可解释性。此外,我们验证了我们的方法在情感分类和自然语言推理上的通用性。

英文摘要:

Implicit Discourse Relation Recognition (IDRR) remains a challenging task due to the requirement for deep semantic understanding in the absence of explicit discourse markers. A further limitation is that existing methods only predict relations without providing any supporting explanations. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have shown strong reasoning capabilities in both deep language understanding and natural language explanation generation. In this work, we propose a simple yet effective approach to distill the reasoning capabilities of LLMs into lightweight IDRR models to improve both performance and interpretability. Specifically, we first prompt an LLM to generate explanations for each training instance conditioned on its gold label. Then, we introduce a novel classification-generation framework that jointly performs relation prediction and explanation generation, and train it with the additional supervision of LLM-generated explanations. Our framework is plug-and-play, enabling easy integration with most existing IDRR models. Experimental results on PDTB demonstrate that our approach significantly improves IDRR performance, while human evaluation further confirms that the generated explanations enhance model interpretability. Furthermore, we validate the generality of our approach on sentiment classification and natural language inference

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑