arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2403.03336cs.CLcs.SI

大语言模型在在线健康话语中挖掘新兴观点的适用范围

Scope of Large Language Models for Mining Emerging Opinions in Online Health Discourse

Dartmouth College(达特茅斯学院)

Joseph Gatto, Madhusudan Basak, Yash Srivastava, Philip Bohlman, Sarah M. Preum

AI总结:

该研究提出LLM驱动的在线健康社区新兴观点挖掘框架,将其建模为Reddit帖文标题-评论对的成对立场检测问题,发布长新冠主题的LC-stance数据集,验证GPT-4零样本立场检测性能更优,并分析模型误差来源。

摘要:

本文开发了一个由大语言模型(LLM)驱动的框架,用于在线健康社区中新兴观点挖掘的整理与评估。我们将新兴观点挖掘建模为来自Reddit的(标题、评论)对之间的成对立场检测问题,其中帖子标题包含某个未预先定义主题的新兴健康相关主张,这些主张由用户显式或隐式表达。我们详细阐述了两部分内容:(i)主张识别方法——即识别帖子标题是否包含主张的任务;(ii)一个由观点挖掘驱动、利用LLM进行立场检测的评估框架。\n为推进研究,我们发布了一个全新的测试数据集Long COVID-Stance(简称LC-stance),可用于评估LLM在在线健康社区中的主张识别和立场检测任务表现。长新冠(Long COVID)是一种新兴的新冠后遗症,治疗指南尚不明确且较为复杂,因此是适合本任务的用例。LC-Stance包含来自一个Reddit社区的长新冠治疗相关话语。我们的评估显示,GPT-4在零样本立场检测上的表现显著优于先前研究。随后我们开展了全面的LLM模型诊断,明确了主张类型(即隐式主张与显式主张)和评论长度是模型误差的来源。

英文摘要:

In this paper, we develop an LLM-powered framework for the curation and evaluation of emerging opinion mining in online health communities. We formulate emerging opinion mining as a pairwise stance detection problem between (title, comment) pairs sourced from Reddit, where post titles contain emerging health-related claims on a topic that is not predefined. The claims are either explicitly or implicitly expressed by the user. We detail (i) a method of claim identification -- the task of identifying if a post title contains a claim and (ii) an opinion mining-driven evaluation framework for stance detection using LLMs. We facilitate our exploration by releasing a novel test dataset, Long COVID-Stance, or LC-stance, which can be used to evaluate LLMs on the tasks of claim identification and stance detection in online health communities. Long Covid is an emerging post-COVID disorder with uncertain and complex treatment guidelines, thus making it a suitable use case for our task. LC-Stance contains long COVID treatment related discourse sourced from a Reddit community. Our evaluation shows that GPT-4 significantly outperforms prior works on zero-shot stance detection. We then perform thorough LLM model diagnostics, identifying the role of claim type (i.e. implicit vs explicit claims) and comment length as sources of model error.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑