arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.15876cs.CYcs.AI
收藏

应该有教师在循环中吗?生成式AI个性化任务中学中学的探讨

Should There be a Teacher In-the-Loop? A Study of Generative AI-Personalized Tasks Middle School

Department of Teaching and Learning(教学与学习系);Southern Methodist University(南方 Methodist 大学);WestEd(西斯特教育);American Institutes for Research(美国研究机构);University of Massachusetts Amherst(马萨诸塞大学阿姆赫斯特分校)

Candace Walkington, Mingyu Feng, Itffini Pruitt-Britton, Theodora Beauchamp, Andrew Lan

AI总结:

研究探讨生成式AI在中学个性化任务中的应用,分析教师与AI协作的效率及学生对不同粒度个性化任务的偏好。

摘要:

适应个别学生细粒度需求的指令调整是近期大语言模型进展的强大应用。这些生成式AI模型可以创建与学生兴趣相符合的任务,实现上下文个性化,增强学生对学术内容的学习兴趣。然而,当教师在循环中使用生成式AI创建或修改任务时,其效率尚不明确,尽管商业生成式AI工具声称能节省教师时间。本研究中,我们与7名中学数学教师合作,利用ChatGPT创建符合其学生兴趣的个性化问题版本。我们分析了教师的提示策略、创建问题的效率,以及其521名七年级学生对个性化作业的反应。研究发现,教师在循环中导致生成式AI增强的个性化在较广的粒度上得以实施,而学生更倾向于较小的粒度,接收特定流行文化参考。教师花费大量精力调整流行文化参考并解决生成问题的深度或现实性问题,赋予生成式AI更高的或更低的归属感。教师在与生成式AI合作创造有趣问题方面有所提高,但这一过程似乎并未变得特别高效,因为教师在学习和反思学生数据时,不断迭代其方法。

英文摘要:

Large language models can be used to design instructional tasks to align to students needs. These generative AI models can create tasks that correspond to students out-of-school interests in areas like sports or music, which may enhance students interest in learning. However, little is known about teachers processes for creating or modifying tasks with generative AI, despite commercial AI companies claims that they will save teachers time. In the present study, 7 middle school mathematics teachers used ChatGPT to create personalized versions of problems in their curriculum to correspond to their students interests. The prompting moves teachers made and their students open-ended feedback on personalized problems were examined through thematic analysis. Teachers efficiency when creating problems and the ratings of their 7th grade students who received personalized assignments were examined. Results from this sample suggest that having a teacher-in-the-loop may result in generative AI-enhanced personalization being enacted at a broad grain size, whereas students often expressed preference for a smaller grain-size where they receive specific popular culture references that interest them. Teachers used prompting to adjust popular culture references and address issues with the depth, ethics, or realism of the problems generated, in some cases showing epistemic agency. The article closes with an exploratory, design-focused look at scalability trade-offs with teacher-facing personalization, patterns of teacher prompting practices, and opportunities for teachers to exercise epistemic and ethical monitoring of personalization outputs.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑