arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2602.10643cs.LG
收藏

合成纵向患者数据中时间保持的评估指标

Evaluation metrics for temporal preservation in synthetic longitudinal patient data

Katariina Perkonoja, Parisa Movahedi, Antti Airola, Kari Auranen, Joni Virta

AI总结:

本文提出评估合成纵向患者数据中时间保持性的多项指标,揭示时间结构保持或退化的机制,提升生成模型的可靠性。

摘要:

本研究引入了一套用于评估合成纵向患者数据中时间保持性的指标,定义为人工生成的数据,模拟真实患者随时间重复测量的数据。所提出的指标评估合成数据如何再现关键时间特征,分为边缘、协方差、个体层面和测量结构。研究表明,强边缘层面相似性可能掩盖协方差的扭曲和个体层面轨迹的中断。时间保持性受原始数据质量、测量频率和预处理策略(如分箱、变量编码和精度)等因素影响。变量具有稀疏或高度不规则的测量时间会限制学习时间依赖性的信息,导致合成数据与原始数据相似性降低。没有单一指标能充分捕捉时间保持性;相反,跨所有特征的多维评估能更全面地评估合成数据质量。总体而言,所提出的指标阐明了时间结构如何被保持或退化,从而更可靠地评估和改进生成模型,并支持创建时间真实感的合成纵向患者数据。

英文摘要:

This study introduces a set of metrics for evaluating temporal preservation in synthetic longitudinal patient data, defined as artificially generated data that mimic real patients' repeated measurements over time. The proposed metrics assess how synthetic data reproduces key temporal characteristics, categorized into marginal, covariance, individual-level and measurement structures. We show that strong marginal-level resemblance may conceal distortions in covariance and disruptions in individual-level trajectories. Temporal preservation is influenced by factors such as original data quality, measurement frequency, and preprocessing strategies, including binning, variable encoding and precision. Variables with sparse or highly irregular measurement times provide limited information for learning temporal dependencies, resulting in reduced resemblance between the synthetic and original data. No single metric adequately captures temporal preservation; instead, a multidimensional evaluation across all characteristics provides a more comprehensive assessment of synthetic data quality. Overall, the proposed metrics clarify how and why temporal structures are preserved or degraded, enabling more reliable evaluation and improvement of generative models and supporting the creation of temporally realistic synthetic longitudinal patient data.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑