arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.09972cs.RO
收藏

Hydra-Nav: 通过自适应双过程推理实现物体导航

Hydra-Nav: Object Navigation via Adaptive Dual-Process Reasoning

Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences(中国科学院自动化研究所);Peking University(北京大学);Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences(中国科学院计算技术研究所)

Zixuan Wang, Huang Fang, Shaoan Wang, Yuanfei Luo, Heng Dong, Wei Li, Yiming Gan

AI总结:

Hydra-Nav通过自适应双过程推理提升物体导航效率,实现高效探索与决策。

摘要:

尽管大型视觉-语言模型(VLMs)在物体目标导航方面显示出潜力,但当前方法仍面临低成功率和对未见过物体的定位效率低下等问题,这些失败主要归因于弱的时空推理能力。同时,最近尝试将推理注入VLM基础代理中虽然提高了成功率,但带来了显著的计算开销。为解决现有方法的无效性和低效性,我们引入了Hydra-Nav,一种统一的VLM架构,能够自适应地在分析探索历史并制定高层次计划的反思性慢系统和用于高效执行的反应性快系统之间切换。我们通过三个阶段的课程训练来训练Hydra-Nav:(i)空间-动作对齐以加强轨迹规划,(ii)记忆-推理整合以增强长时间探索中的时空推理能力,(iii)迭代拒绝微调以在关键决策点实现选择性推理。广泛的实验表明,Hydra-Nav在HM3D、MP3D和OVON基准测试中实现了最先进的性能,分别比第二好的方法高出11.1%、17.4%和21.2%。此外,我们引入了SOT(基于操作时间的成功率)这一新指标,用于衡量具有不同推理强度的VLMs的搜索效率。结果表明,自适应推理显著提高了搜索效率,优于固定频率基线。

英文摘要:

While large vision-language models (VLMs) show promise for object goal navigation, current methods still struggle with low success rates and inefficient localization of unseen objects--failures primarily attributed to weak temporal-spatial reasoning. Meanwhile, recent attempts to inject reasoning into VLM-based agents improve success rates but incur substantial computational overhead. To address both the ineffectiveness and inefficiency of existing approaches, we introduce Hydra-Nav, a unified VLM architecture that adaptively switches between a deliberative slow system for analyzing exploration history and formulating high-level plans, and a reactive fast system for efficient execution. We train Hydra-Nav through a three-stage curriculum: (i) spatial-action alignment to strengthen trajectory planning, (ii) memory-reasoning integration to enhance temporal-spatial reasoning over long-horizon exploration, and (iii) iterative rejection fine-tuning to enable selective reasoning at critical decision points. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Hydra-Nav achieves state-of-the-art performance on the HM3D, MP3D, and OVON benchmarks, outperforming the second-best methods by 11.1%, 17.4%, and 21.2%, respectively. Furthermore, we introduce SOT (Success weighted by Operation Time), a new metric to measure search efficiency across VLMs with varying reasoning intensity. Results show that adaptive reasoning significantly enhances search efficiency over fixed-frequency baselines.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑