arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2602.09934cs.CV
收藏

VersaViT: 通过任务引导优化增强MLLM视觉骨干

VersaViT: Enhancing MLLM Vision Backbones via Task-Guided Optimization

School of Artificial Intelligence, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China(上海交通大学人工智能学院);CMIC, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China(上海交通大学计算机学院);WeChat AI, Tencent Inc., China(腾讯公司)

Yikun Liu, Yuan Liu, Shangzhe Di, Haicheng Wang, Zhongyin Zhao, Le Tian, Xiao Zhou, Jie Zhou, Jiangchao Yao, Yanfeng Wang, Weidi Xie

AI总结:

VersaViT通过任务引导优化增强MLLM视觉骨干,解决其在密集预测任务中的性能问题,提升视觉任务的适应性与表现。

摘要:

多模态大语言模型(MLLMs)最近在视觉-语言理解中取得了显著成功,展示了其在视觉编码器中实现卓越的高层语义对齐的能力。一个重要的问题随之产生:这些编码器能否作为多功能的视觉骨干,可靠地执行经典以视觉为中心的任务?为了解决这个问题,我们做出了以下贡献:(i)我们发现MLLMs中的视觉编码器在密集特征表示上存在缺陷,这从其在密集预测任务(如语义分割、深度估计)上的表现不佳可以得到证明;(ii)我们提出了VersaViT,一种全面的视觉转换器,它实例化了一个新的多任务框架,用于协作后训练。该框架通过轻量级任务头和多粒度监督优化视觉骨干;(iii)在各种下游任务上进行的广泛实验证明了我们方法的有效性,产生了适用于语言引导推理和像素级理解的多功能视觉骨干。

英文摘要:

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have recently achieved remarkable success in visual-language understanding, demonstrating superior high-level semantic alignment within their vision encoders. An important question thus arises: Can these encoders serve as versatile vision backbones, capable of reliably performing classic vision-centric tasks as well? To address the question, we make the following contributions: (i) we identify that the vision encoders within MLLMs exhibit deficiencies in their dense feature representations, as evidenced by their suboptimal performance on dense prediction tasks (e.g., semantic segmentation, depth estimation); (ii) we propose VersaViT, a well-rounded vision transformer that instantiates a novel multi-task framework for collaborative post-training. This framework facilitates the optimization of the vision backbone via lightweight task heads with multi-granularity supervision; (iii) extensive experiments across various downstream tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of our method, yielding a versatile vision backbone suited for both language-mediated reasoning and pixel-level understanding.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑