arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2602.09810cs.LGcs.AI
收藏

在跨环境迁移中的双DQN和对战DQN的受控研究

A Controlled Study of Double DQN and Dueling DQN Under Cross-Environment Transfer

Dhanani School of Science and Engineering(丹尼尼科学与工程学院)

Azkaa Nasir, Fatima Dossa, Muhammad Ahmed Atif, Mohammad Shahid Shaikh

AI总结:

本文通过对比DDQN和对战DQN在跨环境迁移中的表现,发现DDQN在迁移中更稳定,而对战DQN则易出现负迁移。

摘要:

深度强化学习中的迁移学习通常由改进的稳定性和减少训练成本所驱动,但其在显著的领域转移下可能失败。本文提出了一项受控的实证研究,探讨双深度Q网络(DDQN)和对战DQN之间架构差异如何影响跨环境的迁移行为。使用CartPole作为源任务,LunarLander作为结构上不同的目标任务,我们在相同超参数和训练条件下评估固定层间表示迁移协议,使用从头训练的基线智能体来 contextualize 迁移效果。实证结果表明,在所考察的设置中,DDQN始终避免了负迁移,并在目标环境中保持与基线性能相当的学习动态。相比之下,对战DQN在相同条件下始终表现出负迁移,表现为奖励下降和优化行为不稳定。跨多个随机种子的统计分析确认了在迁移下的显著性能差距。这些发现表明,在所考察的迁移协议下,架构归纳偏置与价值深度强化学习中对跨环境迁移的鲁棒性密切相关。

英文摘要:

Transfer learning in deep reinforcement learning is often motivated by improved stability and reduced training cost, but it can also fail under substantial domain shift. This paper presents a controlled empirical study examining how architectural differences between Double Deep Q-Networks (DDQN) and Dueling DQN influence transfer behavior across environments. Using CartPole as a source task and LunarLander as a structurally distinct target task, we evaluate a fixed layer-wise representation transfer protocol under identical hyperparameters and training conditions, with baseline agents trained from scratch used to contextualize transfer effects. Empirical results show that DDQN consistently avoids negative transfer under the examined setup and maintains learning dynamics comparable to baseline performance in the target environment. In contrast, Dueling DQN consistently exhibits negative transfer under identical conditions, characterized by degraded rewards and unstable optimization behavior. Statistical analysis across multiple random seeds confirms a significant performance gap under transfer. These findings suggest that architectural inductive bias is strongly associated with robustness to cross-environment transfer in value-based deep reinforcement learning under the examined transfer protocol.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑