arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2602.09173cs.LGcs.AI
收藏

$n$-Musketeers: 通过强化学习塑造语言模型间的协作

$n$-Musketeers: Reinforcement Learning Shapes Collaboration Among Language Models

University of California, Irvine(加州大学欧文分校);Intel Corporation(英特尔公司);United States Military Academy at West Point(美国西点军校);Northeastern University(东北大学)

Ryozo Masukawa, Sanggeon Yun, Hyunwoo Oh, SuhgHeon Jeong, Raheeb Hassa, Hanning Chen, Wenjun Huang, Mahdi Imani, Pietro Mercati, Nathaniel D. Bastian, Mohsen Imani

AI总结:

本文提出软隐藏状态协作方法,通过可训练的注意力接口整合多个冻结的SLM专家,实验证明其在推理任务中与强基线竞争,并揭示了专家利用的双机制。

摘要:

最近在具有可验证奖励的强化学习(RLVR)中的进展表明,小型、专门化的语言模型(SLMs)可以在不依赖大型单体LLM的情况下表现出结构化的推理能力。我们介绍了软隐藏状态协作,其中多个异构的冻结SLM专家通过其内部表示通过可训练的注意力接口进行整合。在Reasoning Gym和GSM8K上的实验表明,这种潜在整合在与强大的单模型RLVR基线竞争。消融分析进一步揭示了专家利用的双机制:对于更简单的算术领域,性能提升可以很大程度上由静态专家偏好解释,而更具挑战性的设置则诱导出越来越集中和结构化的专家注意力,表明在训练过程中路由器如何连接到相关专家出现了涌现的专业化。总体而言,隐藏状态协作提供了一种紧凑的机制来利用冻结的专家,同时提供了一个观察专家利用模式及其在RLVR下的演变的窗口。

英文摘要:

Recent progress in reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) shows that small, specialized language models (SLMs) can exhibit structured reasoning without relying on large monolithic LLMs. We introduce soft hidden-state collaboration, where multiple heterogeneous frozen SLM experts are integrated through their internal representations via a trainable attention interface. Experiments on Reasoning Gym and GSM8K show that this latent integration is competitive with strong single-model RLVR baselines. Ablations further reveal a dual mechanism of expert utilization: for simpler arithmetic domains, performance gains can largely be explained by static expert preferences, whereas more challenging settings induce increasingly concentrated and structured expert attention over training, indicating emergent specialization in how the router connects to relevant experts. Overall, hidden-state collaboration provides a compact mechanism for leveraging frozen experts, while offering an observational window into expert utilization patterns and their evolution under RLVR.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑