arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.09007cs.AIcs.CV
收藏

GEBench: 图形用户界面生成模型的基准测试

GUI-GenBench: Evaluating Image Generation Models as Interactive GUI Environments

StepFun;South China University of Technology(南方科技大学);Peking University(北京大学);Tsinghua University(清华大学);Institute of Automation Chinese Academy of Sciences(中国科学院自动化研究所);The University of Chicago(芝加哥大学);Nanyang Technological University(南洋理工大学)
Haodong Li, Jingwei Wu, Quan Sun, Guopeng Li, Juanxi Tian, Ziyu Guo, Donghao Zhou, Tianfei Ren, Huanyu Zhang, Yanlin Lai, Ruichuan An, Hongbo Peng, Yuhong Dai, … 展开作者

Haodong Li, Jingwei Wu, Quan Sun, Guopeng Li, Juanxi Tian, Ziyu Guo, Donghao Zhou, Tianfei Ren, Huanyu Zhang, Yanlin Lai, Ruichuan An, Hongbo Peng, Yuhong Dai, Jia Wang, Ziyang Meng, Zheng Ge, Xiangyu Zhang, Daxin Jiang, Pheng-Ann Heng

AI总结:

GEBench提出一个评估GUI生成模型动态交互和时间一致性的基准测试,通过五维指标揭示模型在多步交互中的瓶颈问题。

摘要:

最近图像生成模型的进步使基于用户指令预测未来图形用户界面(GUI)状态成为可能。然而,现有基准测试主要关注通用领域视觉保真度,忽略了GUI特定情境中的状态转换和时间一致性评估。为解决这一差距,我们引入GEBench,一个全面评估GUI生成动态交互和时间一致性的基准测试。GEBench包含700个精心挑选的样本,涵盖五个任务类别,包括现实世界和虚构场景中的单步交互和多步轨迹,以及定位点定位。为了支持系统评估,我们提出了GE-Score,一种新的五维指标,评估目标达成、交互逻辑、内容一致性、UI合理性以及视觉质量。对当前模型的广泛评估表明,尽管它们在单步转换上表现良好,但在更长交互序列中维持时间一致性和空间定位方面存在显著困难。我们的发现识别出图标解释、文本渲染和定位精度是关键瓶颈。本工作为系统评估提供了基础,并为未来研究指明了有前途的方向,以构建高保真度的生成GUI环境。代码可在:https://github.com/stepfun-ai/GEBench获取。

英文摘要:

An image generation model used as a graphical user interface (GUI) environment must produce not only a plausible screen but also the correct response to an action. Existing visual-generation benchmarks do not directly assess this combination of functional correctness and temporal consistency in GUIs. We introduce GUI-GenBench, a benchmark of 700 curated samples across five task suites: single-step transitions, multi-step planning, fictional-app generation, real-app trajectories, and coordinate-based grounding. We also introduce GUI-Score, a VLM-based metric that assesses Goal Achievement, Interaction Logic, Content Consistency, UI Plausibility, and Visual Quality. Evaluating 12 image generation models on Chinese and English subsets, we find that strong single-step performance does not consistently extend to coherent multi-step trajectories or accurate grounding. The highest aggregate GUI-Scores are 69.62 on the Chinese subset and 63.16 on the English subset. Qualitative analysis further identifies failures in text rendering, icon interpretation, and coordinate-conditioned transitions. Together, these results distinguish visual plausibility from functional reliability and identify limitations that must be addressed before generated GUIs can serve as dependable interaction environments.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑