arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
北美退伍军人节(Veterans Day),12 日无更新
arXiv 2602.08321cs.CL
收藏

改进大型语言模型中的数据与奖励设计以提升科学推理能力

Improving Data and Reward Design for Scientific Reasoning in Large Language Models

Zhejiang University(浙江大学);Westlake University(西湖大学);Microsoft Research Asia(微软亚洲研究院)

Zijie Chen, Zhenghao Lin, Xiao Liu, Zhenzhong Lan, Yeyun Gong, Peng Cheng

AI总结:

本文提出Dr. SCI数据集和后训练流程,通过探索扩展SFT、动态难度课程和SciRubric引导RL提升大型语言模型的科学推理能力。

摘要:

解决开放性科学问题仍对大型语言模型构成挑战,尤其是由于固有不可靠的监督和评估。瓶颈在于科学后训练的数据构建和奖励设计。我们开发了一个大规模、系统化的数据处理流程,将异构的开源科学数据转换为Dr. SCI数据集,该数据集包含100万道涵盖八个STEM学科的问题,具有明确可验证的开放式划分、可扩展的难度标注和细粒度的评分标准,以操作化评估开放式答案。基于此数据集,我们提出了Dr. SCI后训练流程,通过三个组件重设计标准SFT->RL流程:(i) 探索-扩展SFT,扩大模型在RL前的推理模式覆盖;(ii) 动态难度课程,使训练数据适应模型不断发展的科学能力;(iii) SciRubric引导的RL,通过基于评分标准的评估实现稳定强化学习于开放式科学问题。使用Dr. SCI流程训练的Qwen3-4B-Base在GPQA-diamond上达到63.2分,在GPQA-general上达到32.4分,持续优于强大的后训练基线,如o1-mini和GPT-4o,显示出在科学推理,尤其是开放式设置中的显著提升。

英文摘要:

Solving open-ended science questions remains challenging for large language models, particularly due to inherently unreliable supervision and evaluation. The bottleneck lies in the data construction and reward design for scientific post-training. We develop a large-scale, systematic data processing pipeline that transforms heterogeneous open-source science data into Dr. SCI dataset, which comprises of 1M questions across eight STEM subjects, with explicit verifiable/open-ended splits, scalable difficulty annotation, and fine-grained rubrics that operationalize evaluation for open-ended answers. Building on this dataset, we propose the Dr. SCI post-training pipeline, which redesigns the standard SFT -> RL workflow through three components: (i) Exploration-Expanding SFT, which broadens the model's reasoning pattern coverage prior to RL; (ii) Dynamic Difficulty Curriculum, which adapts training data to the model's evolving scientific capability; and (iii) SciRubric-Guided RL, which enables stable reinforcement learning on open-ended scientific questions via rubric-based evaluation with explicit answer correctness. Qwen3-4B-Base trained using Dr. SCI pipeline achieves 63.2 on GPQA-diamond and 32.4 on GPQA-general, consistently improves over strong post-trained baselines such as o1-mini and GPT-4o, demonstrating substantial gains in scientific reasoning, especially in open-ended settings.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑