arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2602.07477stat.MEcs.LGstat.APstat.COstat.ML
收藏

Cox模型中变量选择后的统计推断:一项模拟研究

Statistical inference after variable selection in Cox models: A simulation study

Mathematical Statistics and Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University of Augsburg(医学中的数学统计与人工智能,乌尔姆大学);Center for Advanced Analytics and Predictive Sciences (CAAPS), University of Augsburg(高级分析与预测科学中心(CAAPS),乌尔姆大学)

Lena Schemet, Sarah Friedrich-Welz

AI总结:

本文通过模拟研究探讨了Cox模型中变量选择后Lasso和适应性Lasso的推断方法,分析了样本分割、精确后选择推断和去偏Lasso的性能,并通过实际数据验证其应用效果。

摘要:

在生物医学时间到事件数据的分析中,选择相关预测变量是至关重要的。然而,经典频数推断假设协变量集是提前固定的,并不考虑数据驱动的变量选择。因此,基于选择后的推断可能会有偏见和误导性。在右删失生存设置中,这些问题可能进一步被删失引入的额外不确定性加剧。我们研究了几种在变量选择后应用于Cox模型中Lasso及其扩展形式适应性Lasso的系数推断程序。考虑的方法包括样本分割、精确后选择推断和去偏Lasso。它们的表现被检验在一项中性模拟研究中,反映了生物医学应用中常见的协变量结构和删失率。为了补充模拟结果,我们使用公开可用的生存数据集,展示了这些程序在实际应用中的行为。

英文摘要:

Choosing relevant predictors is central to the analysis of biomedical time-to-event data. Classical frequentist inference, however, presumes that the set of covariates is fixed in advance and does not account for data-driven variable selection. As a consequence, naive post-selection inference may be biased and misleading. In right-censored survival settings, these issues may be further exacerbated by the additional uncertainty induced by censoring. We investigate several inference procedures applied after variable selection for the coefficients of the Lasso and its extension, the adaptive Lasso, in the context of the Cox model. The methods considered include sample splitting, exact post-selection inference, and the debiased Lasso. Their performance is examined in a neutral simulation study reflecting realistic covariate structures and censoring rates commonly encountered in biomedical applications. To complement the simulation results, we illustrate the practical behavior of these procedures in an applied example using a publicly available survival dataset.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑