arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.07025cs.CVcs.AI
收藏

视觉语言模型中表征失败的几何结构

The Geometry of Representational Failures in Vision Language Models

Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Torino(都灵大学物理系);Princeton Neuroscience Institute and AI Lab, Princeton University(普林斯顿大学神经科学研究所和AI实验室);Intesa Sanpaolo AI Research(Intesa Sanpaolo AI研究中心);Dipartimento di Scienze Matematiche, Politecnico di Torino(都灵理工学院数学科学系);Network Science Institute, Northeastern University London, UK(伦敦大学东北方大学网络科学研究所)

Daniele Savietto, Declan Campbell, André Panisson, Marco Nurisso, Giovanni Petri, Jonathan D. Cohen, Alan Perotti

AI总结:

通过分析开源视觉语言模型的概念向量几何重叠,揭示多目标视觉任务中幻觉等错误与认知约束的关联,并提出基于干预的验证方法。

摘要:

视觉语言模型在多目标视觉任务中表现出令人困惑的失败,例如幻觉不存在的元素或未能识别干扰中最相似的物体。虽然这些错误反映了人类的认知约束,如“绑定问题”,但在人工系统中驱动这些错误的内部机制仍然知之甚少。在这里,我们通过分析开源视觉语言模型(Qwen、InternVL、Gemma)的表征几何结构,提出了一种机制性见解,比较了提炼“概念向量”(编码视觉概念的潜在方向)的方法。我们通过引导干预验证了概念向量,这些干预在简化和自然视觉任务中可靠地操纵模型行为(例如,强制模型将红色花朵感知为蓝色)。我们观察到这些向量之间的几何重叠与特定错误模式强相关,提供了一个有依据的定量框架来理解内部表征如何塑造模型行为并驱动视觉失败。

英文摘要:

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) exhibit puzzling failures in multi-object visual tasks, such as hallucinating non-existent elements or failing to identify the most similar objects among distractions. While these errors mirror human cognitive constraints, such as the 'Binding Problem', the internal mechanisms driving them in artificial systems remain poorly understood. Here, we propose a mechanistic insight by analyzing the representational geometry of open-weight VLMs (Qwen, InternVL, Gemma), comparing methodologies to distill "concept vectors'' - latent directions encoding visual concepts. We validate our concept vectors via steering interventions that reliably manipulate model behavior in both simplified and naturalistic vision tasks (e.g., forcing the model to perceive a red flower as blue). We observe that the geometric overlap between these vectors strongly correlates with specific error patterns, offering a grounded quantitative framework to understand how internal representations shape model behavior and drive visual failures.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑