arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.05693cs.LGcs.DC
收藏

FedRandom: 在联邦学习中实现采样一致且准确的贡献值

FedRandom: Sampling Consistent and Accurate Contribution Values in Federated Learning

Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust(安全、可靠性与信任跨学科研究中心)

Arno Geimer, Beltran Fiz Pontiveros, Radu State

AI总结:

FedRandom通过生成更多样本来缓解联邦学习中贡献估计的不稳定性,提升了模型的稳定性和准确性。

摘要:

联邦学习是一种保护隐私的去中心化机器学习方法。在企业部署中,由于实体数量有限但数据丰富,参与者在塑造全局模型中的作用变得至关重要,因为参与联邦会带来成本,参与者可能期望获得补偿。此外,参与者的贡献是识别和解决潜在恶意行为者和搭便车者的重要手段。然而,公平评估个体贡献仍然是一个重大障碍。最近的研究表明,聚合策略在贡献估计中存在显著的内在不稳定性。虽然采用不同的策略可能带来收敛优势,但这种不稳定性可能会对参与者参与联邦的意愿产生潜在的负面影响。在本工作中,我们引入了FedRandom,一种新的缓解贡献不稳定性问题的技术。将不稳定性视为统计估计问题,FedRandom允许我们生成比使用常规FL策略更多的样本。我们证明这些额外的样本提供了更一致和可靠的参与者贡献评估。我们使用不同的数据分布在CIFAR-10、MNIST、CIFAR-100和FMNIST上展示了我们的方法,并表明FedRandom在一半的评估场景中将整体距离减少超过三分之一,并在超过90%的情况下提高了稳定性。

英文摘要:

Federated Learning is a privacy-preserving decentralized approach for Machine Learning tasks. In industry deployments characterized by a limited number of entities possessing abundant data, the significance of a participant's role in shaping the global model becomes pivotal given that participation in a federation incurs costs, and participants may expect compensation for their involvement. Additionally, the contributions of participants serve as a crucial means to identify and address potential malicious actors and free-riders. However, fairly assessing individual contributions remains a significant hurdle. Recent works have demonstrated a considerable inherent instability in contribution estimations across aggregation strategies. While employing a different strategy may offer convergence benefits, this instability can have potentially harming effects on the willingness of participants in engaging in the federation. In this work, we introduce FedRandom, a novel mitigation technique to the contribution instability problem. Tackling the instability as a statistical estimation problem, FedRandom allows us to generate more samples than when using regular FL strategies. We show that these additional samples provide a more consistent and reliable evaluation of participant contributions. We demonstrate our approach using different data distributions across CIFAR-10, MNIST, CIFAR-100 and FMNIST and show that FedRandom reduces the overall distance to the ground truth by more than a third in half of all evaluated scenarios, and improves stability in more than 90% of cases.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑