arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.05037cs.CV
收藏

UniTrack:用于多目标跟踪的可微图表示学习

UniTrack: Differentiable Graph Representation Learning for Multi-Object Tracking

Augmented Cognition Lab (ACLab), Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Northeastern University(增强认知实验室(ACLab)、电气与计算机工程系、东北大学)

Bishoy Galoaa, Xiangyu Bai, Utsav Nandi, Sai Siddhartha Vivek Dhir Rangoju, Somaieh Amraee, Sarah Ostadabbas

AI总结:

UniTrack通过统一的可微学习方法,提升多目标跟踪性能,减少身份切换并提高IDF1指标。

摘要:

我们提出了UniTrack,一种即插即用的图论损失函数,旨在通过统一的可微学习直接优化跟踪特定目标,显著提升多目标跟踪(MOT)性能。与以往基于图的MOT方法不同,UniTrack提供了一个通用的训练目标,将检测精度、身份保持和时空一致性整合到一个端到端可训练的损失函数中,使无缝集成现有MOT系统成为可能,而无需修改架构。通过可微图表示学习,UniTrack使网络能够学习跨帧的运动连续性和身份关系的完整表示。我们验证了UniTrack在多种跟踪模型和多个具有挑战性的基准测试中的一致性改进,包括Trackformer、MOTR、FairMOT、ByteTrack、GTR和MOTE。广泛评估显示,在具有挑战性的基准测试中,身份切换减少了53%,IDF1提高了12%,GTR在SportsMOT上实现了9.7%的MOTA峰值性能提升。

英文摘要:

We present UniTrack, a plug-and-play graph-theoretic loss function designed to significantly enhance multi-object tracking (MOT) performance by directly optimizing tracking-specific objectives through unified differentiable learning. Unlike prior graph-based MOT methods that redesign tracking architectures, UniTrack provides a universal training objective that integrates detection accuracy, identity preservation, and spatiotemporal consistency into a single end-to-end trainable loss function, enabling seamless integration with existing MOT systems without architectural modifications. Through differentiable graph representation learning, UniTrack enables networks to learn holistic representations of motion continuity and identity relationships across frames. We validate UniTrack across diverse tracking models and multiple challenging benchmarks, demonstrating consistent improvements across all tested architectures and datasets including Trackformer, MOTR, FairMOT, ByteTrack, GTR, and MOTE. Extensive evaluations show up to 53\% reduction in identity switches and 12\% IDF1 improvements across challenging benchmarks, with GTR achieving peak performance gains of 9.7\% MOTA on SportsMOT.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑