arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2602.03348math.NAcs.NA
收藏

关于超几何守恒律低耗散数值方案的比较研究

A Comparative Study of Low-Dissipation Numerical Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws

RWTH Aachen University(亚琛工业大学);University of Pretoria(比勒陀利亚大学)

Shaoshuai Chu, Michael Herty

AI总结:

本文比较了多种低耗散数值方案在超几何守恒律中的性能,分析了其在精度、鲁棒性和计算成本方面的权衡,为复杂压缩流模拟提供了实用指导。

摘要:

本文对几种用于超几何守恒律的低耗散数值方案进行了比较评估,突显了它们相对于经典Harten-Lax-van Leer(HLL)方案的性能。考虑的方案包括经典的Harten-Lax-van Leer-Contact(HLLC)、最近提出的TV通量分裂、低耗散中心迎风(LDCU)以及基于局部特征分解的中心迎风(LCDCU)方案。这些方法在有限体积和有限差分框架内被扩展到更高的精度,最高达到五阶。为了评估所研究方案的准确性、鲁棒性和计算效率,进行了若干针对一维和二维气体动力学欧拉方程的数值实验。比较突显了在接触波和剪切波的分辨率、在激波存在下的鲁棒性以及计算成本之间的权衡。所研究的低耗散方案显示出相近的数值耗散水平,在选定的基准问题中仅出现细微差异。结果为选择高效的低耗散求解器以模拟复杂压缩流提供了实际指导。

英文摘要:

This work provides a comparative assessment of several low-dissipation numerical schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws, highlighting their performance relative to the classical Harten-Lax-van Leer (HLL) schemes. The schemes under consideration include the classical Harten-Lax-van Leer-Contact (HLLC), the recently proposed TV flux splitting, the low-dissipation Central-Upwind (LDCU), and the local characteristic decomposition-based Central-Upwind (LCDCU) schemes. These methods are extended to higher orders of accuracy, up to the fifth order, within both finite-volume and finite-difference frameworks. A series of numerical experiments for the one- and two-dimensional Euler equations of gas dynamics are performed to evaluate the accuracy, robustness, and computational efficiency of the studied schemes. The comparison highlights the trade-offs between resolution of contact and shear waves, robustness in the presence of shocks, and computational cost. The investigated low-dissipation schemes show comparable levels of numerical dissipation, with only subtle differences appearing in selected benchmark problems. The results provide practical guidance for selecting efficient low-dissipation solvers for the simulation of complex compressible flows.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑