arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2602.03124cs.CVcs.LG

特征、对齐与监督在类别学习中的作用:基于儿童与神经网络的比较方法

Feature, Alignment, and Supervision in Category Learning: A Comparative Approach with Children and Neural Networks

Department of Psychology, University of Southern California(南加州大学心理学系);Department of Statistics and Data Science, University of California, Los Angeles(加州大学洛杉矶分校统计与数据科学系)

Fanxiao Wani Qiu, Oscar Leong

AI总结:

本文通过比较儿童与神经网络在少量半监督类别学习任务中的表现,揭示了监督、特征结构和对齐在学习过程中的相互作用。

摘要:

理解人类和机器如何从稀疏数据中学习是认知科学和机器学习的核心问题。采用一种公平物种设计,我们比较了儿童和卷积神经网络(CNNs)在少量半监督类别学习任务中的表现。两种学习者都在相同条件下接触新的物体类别。学习者接收标记和未标记示例的混合物,同时我们改变监督(1/3/6标签)、目标特征(大小、形状、模式)和感知对齐(高/低)。我们发现,儿童能从极少量标签中快速泛化,但表现出强烈的特征特定偏见和对对齐的敏感性。CNNs则表现出不同的交互模式:增加的监督提高了性能,但对齐和特征结构调节了额外监督对学习的影响。这些结果表明,人类-模型比较必须在正确的条件下进行,强调监督、特征结构和对齐之间的相互作用,而非总体准确性。

英文摘要:

Understanding how humans and machines learn from sparse data is central to cognitive science and machine learning. Using a species-fair design, we compare children and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in a few-shot semi-supervised category learning task. Both learners are exposed to novel object categories under identical conditions. Learners receive mixtures of labeled and unlabeled exemplars while we vary supervision (1/3/6 labels), target feature (size, shape, pattern), and perceptual alignment (high/low). We find that children generalize rapidly from minimal labels but show strong feature-specific biases and sensitivity to alignment. CNNs show a different interaction profile: added supervision improves performance, but both alignment and feature structure moderate the impact additional supervision has on learning. These results show that human-model comparisons must be drawn under the right conditions, emphasizing interactions among supervision, feature structure, and alignment rather than overall accuracy.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑