人机交互中的伦理不对称性 - 斯帕罗假说的实证检验
Ethical Asymmetry in Human-Robot Interaction - An Empirical Test of Sparrow's Hypothesis
AI总结：
本研究通过实验证实了道德行为可许可性对德性评分的影响，未支持斯帕罗的伦理不对称性假说，同时对德性基本品质问卷进行了改进。
摘要：
人类机器人交互的伦理问题已基于三种传统框架进行了广泛讨论：义务论、结果论和德性伦理。我们进行了一项混合的组内/组间实验，以检验斯帕罗提出的伦理不对称性假说。道德行为的可许可性（MPA）作为被试分组变量，而德性类型（审慎、正义、勇敢和节制）作为组内变量。我们使用在线问卷测试道德刺激，用感知道德行为可许可性（PMPA）和感知德性分数（PVS）作为响应指标。PVS指标基于对已建立的德性基本品质问卷（QCV）的改编，而PMPA基于马勒等人[39]的工作。我们发现MPA显著影响PMPA和感知德性分数。描述MPA与PVS之间关系的最佳模型是立方模型，其本质上是对称的。本研究未证实斯帕罗的不对称性假说。QCV的改编预计对未来的研究有帮助，有待进一步的心理测量属性评估。
英文摘要：
The ethics of human-robot interaction (HRI) have been discussed extensively based on three traditional frameworks: deontology, consequentialism, and virtue ethics. We conducted a mixed within/between experiment to investigate Sparrow's proposed ethical asymmetry hypothesis in human treatment of robots. The moral permissibility of action (MPA) was manipulated as a subject grouping variable, and virtue type (prudence, justice, courage, and temperance) was controlled as a within-subjects factor. We tested moral stimuli using an online questionnaire with Perceived Moral Permissibility of Action (PMPA) and Perceived Virtue Scores (PVS) as response measures. The PVS measure was based on an adaptation of the established Questionnaire on Cardinal Virtues (QCV), while the PMPA was based on Malle et al. [39] work. We found that the MPA significantly influenced the PMPA and perceived virtue scores. The best-fitting model to describe the relationship between PMPA and PVS was cubic, which is symmetrical in nature. Our study did not confirm Sparrow's asymmetry hypothesis. The adaptation of the QCV is expected to have utility for future studies, pending additional psychometric property assessments.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
