arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2602.02564cs.LGcs.MA
收藏

使用代理AI进行标签校准

Label Curation Using Agentic AI

New Jersey Institute of Technology(新泽西理工学院)

Subhodeep Ghosh, Bayan Divaaniaazar, Md Ishat-E-Rabban, Spencer Clarke, Senjuti Basu Roy

AI总结:

AURA通过代理AI框架实现大规模多模态数据标注,通过概率模型联合推断真实标签和标注者可靠性,提升标注准确性并评估标注者质量。

摘要:

数据标注对于监督学习至关重要,但随着数据集规模和模态的增加,产生准确、无偏和可扩展的标签仍然具有挑战性。传统的以人为中心的流程成本高、速度慢且容易受到标注者变异的影响,推动了可靠性意识的自动化标注。我们提出了AURA(统一可靠性建模和标注聚合的代理AI),一种用于大规模、多模态数据标注的代理AI框架。AURA协调多个AI代理生成和验证标签,而无需真实标签。其核心是适应一个经典的概率模型,通过混淆矩阵联合推断潜在的真实标签和标注者可靠性,使用期望最大化法来调和冲突的标注并聚合嘈杂的预测。在评估的四个基准数据集中,AURA在基线基础上实现了高达5.8%的准确率提升。在标注质量较差的更具挑战性的设置中,提升幅度达到基线的50%以上。AURA还能准确估计标注者的可靠性,允许在没有任何预验证步骤的情况下评估标注者质量。

英文摘要:

Data annotation is essential for supervised learning, yet producing accurate, unbiased, and scalable labels remains challenging as datasets grow in size and modality. Traditional human-centric pipelines are costly, slow, and prone to annotator variability, motivating reliability-aware automated annotation. We present AURA (Agentic AI for Unified Reliability Modeling and Annotation Aggregation), an agentic AI framework for large-scale, multi-modal data annotation. AURA coordinates multiple AI agents to generate and validate labels without requiring ground truth. At its core, AURA adapts a classical probabilistic model that jointly infers latent true labels and annotator reliability via confusion matrices, using Expectation-Maximization to reconcile conflicting annotations and aggregate noisy predictions. Across the four benchmark datasets evaluated, AURA achieves accuracy improvements of up to 5.8% over baseline. In more challenging settings with poor quality annotators, the improvement is up to 50% over baseline. AURA also accurately estimates the reliability of annotators, allowing assessment of annotator quality even without any pre-validation steps.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑