面向交通智能体AI应用的多标签意图识别的模块化、无数据流水线
A Modular, Data-Free Pipeline for Multi-Label Intention Recognition in Transportation Agentic AI Applications
AI总结:
本文提出模块化无数据流水线DMTC,通过LLM合成查询、Sentence-T5嵌入和在线焦点对比损失训练轻量分类器,实现交通智能体AI中的多标签意图识别,并在海事场景中取得优于现有方法的性能。
摘要:
本研究提出了一种模块化、无数据的多标签意图识别流水线,用于交通领域的智能体AI应用。传统的意图识别系统依赖大规模标注语料,且往往难以实现细粒度、多标签的判别,而我们的方法消除了昂贵的数据采集需求,同时提升了多标签意图理解的准确性。具体而言,该整体流水线命名为DMTC,包含三个步骤:1)利用提示工程引导大语言模型(LLMs)生成不同交通场景下的多样化合成查询;2)使用Sentence-T5模型对每个文本查询进行编码,以获得紧凑的语义嵌入;3)使用一种新颖的在线焦点对比(OFC)损失训练轻量级分类器,该损失强调困难样本并最大化类间可分性。该流水线的适用性在海事运输背景下的智能体AI应用中得到了验证。大量实验表明,DMTC实现了5.35%的汉明损失和95.92%的AUC,优于最先进的多标签分类器以及近期端到端SOTA的基于LLM的基线方法。进一步分析表明,与其他编码器相比,Sentence-T5嵌入将子集准确率提高了至少3.29%,并且与标准对比目标相比,引入OFC损失额外带来了0.98%的提升。总之,我们的系统能够将用户查询无缝路由到任务特定模块(例如ETA信息、交通风险评估以及交通领域的其他典型场景),为无需昂贵人工标注的完全自主、意图感知的智能体奠定了基础。
英文摘要:
In this study, a modular, data-free pipeline for multi-label intention recognition is proposed for agentic AI applications in transportation. Unlike traditional intent recognition systems that depend on large, annotated corpora and often struggle with fine-grained, multi-label discrimination, our approach eliminates the need for costly data collection while enhancing the accuracy of multi-label intention understanding. Specifically, the overall pipeline, named DMTC, consists of three steps: 1) using prompt engineering to guide large language models (LLMs) to generate diverse synthetic queries in different transport scenarios; 2) encoding each textual query with a Sentence-T5 model to obtain compact semantic embeddings; 3) training a lightweight classifier using a novel online focal-contrastive (OFC) loss that emphasizes hard samples and maximizes inter-class separability. The applicability of the proposed pipeline is demonstrated in an agentic AI application in the maritime transportation context. Extensive experiments show that DMTC achieves a Hamming loss of 5.35% and an AUC of 95.92%, outperforming state-of-the-art multi-label classifiers and recent end-to-end SOTA LLM-based baselines. Further analysis reveals that Sentence-T5 embeddings improve subset accuracy by at least 3.29% over alternative encoders, and integrating the OFC loss yields an additional 0.98% gain compared to standard contrastive objectives. In conclusion, our system seamlessly routes user queries to task-specific modules (e.g., ETA information, traffic risk evaluation, and other typical scenarios in the transportation domain), laying the groundwork for fully autonomous, intention-aware agents without costly manual labelling.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。