arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2602.02452eess.SYcs.SY
收藏

网络SIR动态的鲁棒安全关键控制

Robust Safety-Critical Control of Networked SIR Dynamics

Elmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University(普渡大学埃尔莫电气与计算机工程学院);Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the University of California, Irvine(加州大学尔湾分校电气与计算机工程系)

Saba Samadi, Brooks A. Butler, Philip E. Paré

AI总结:

本文提出了一种基于控制屏障函数和鲁棒控制屏障函数的网络SIR动态鲁棒安全关键控制方法,通过补偿项增强对不确定性的安全性,以确保公共卫生安全。

摘要:

我们提出了一种针对网络化易感-感染-康复(SIR)流行病动态的鲁棒安全关键控制框架,利用控制屏障函数(CBFs)和鲁棒控制屏障函数来解决流行病传播和缓解的挑战。在我们的网络SIR模型中,每个节点必须在动态交互与邻近节点以及流行病参数和测量误差的固有不确定性下,保持感染水平低于临界阈值,以确保公共卫生安全。我们首先推导出一种基于CBF的控制器,以保证在名义情况下感染阈值不被超过。我们通过引入补偿项来增强框架以处理现实中的流行病场景,这些补偿项增强了对不确定性的安全性:一种用于均匀不确定性的独立方法,具有恒定的界限,以及一种新的方法,其规模随状态变化,以捕捉早期或受抑制爆发阶段中相对噪声的增加。对网络SIR系统的仿真结果表明,名义上的CBF控制器在低不确定性下保持安全,而鲁棒方法在更高不确定性下提供正式的安全保证;特别是,新方法采用更保守的控制措施以提供更大的安全边际,而独立方法通过允许感染水平接近边界来优化资源分配,在稳定流行病阶段。

英文摘要:

We present a robust safety-critical control framework tailored for networked susceptible-infected-recovered (SIR) epidemic dynamics, leveraging control barrier functions (CBFs) and robust control barrier functions to address the challenges of epidemic spread and mitigation. In our networked SIR model, each node must keep its infection level below a critical threshold, despite dynamic interactions with neighboring nodes and inherent uncertainties in the epidemic parameters and measurement errors, to ensure public health safety. We first derive a CBF-based controller that guarantees infection thresholds are not exceeded in the nominal case. We enhance the framework to handle realistic epidemic scenarios under uncertainties by incorporating compensation terms that reinforce safety against uncertainties: an independent method with constant bounds for uniform uncertainty, and a novel approach that scales with the state to capture increased relative noise in early or suppressed outbreak stages. Simulation results on a networked SIR system illustrate that the nominal CBF controller maintains safety under low uncertainty, while the robust approaches provide formal safety guarantees under higher uncertainties; in particular, the novel method employs more conservative control efforts to provide larger safety margins, whereas the independent approach optimizes resource allocation by allowing infection levels to approach the boundaries in steady epidemic regimes.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑