arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.02130cs.CV

消除合成CT生成中的注册偏差:一种基于物理的模拟框架

Eliminating Registration Bias in Synthetic CT Generation: A Physics-Based Simulation Framework

organization= Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology , city= Vienna , country= Austria;organization= Christian Doppler Laboratory for Image;Knowledge Driven Precision Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna , city= Vienna , country= Austria;organization= University of Applied Sciences Wiener Neustadt, Competence Center for Preclinical Imaging \& Biomedical Engineering , city= Wiener Neustadt , country= Austria

Lukas Zimmermann, Michael Rauter, Maximilian Schmid, Dietmar Georg, Barbara Knäusl

AI总结:

本文提出基于物理的CBCT模拟框架,通过构造几何对齐的训练对,解决合成CT生成中的注册偏差问题,证明几何保真度优于传统强度评分。

摘要:

监督性合成CT生成从CBCT需要注册的训练对,但单独获取的扫描之间的完美注册仍然无法实现。这种注册偏差会传播到训练模型中,并腐蚀标准评估指标。这可能表明,优越的基准性能可能表示更好的注册伪影再现而非解剖保真度。我们提出基于物理的CBCT模拟,通过构造来提供几何对齐的训练对,并结合使用几何对齐指标与输入CBCT进行评估,而不是有偏的地面真实值。在两个独立的盆腔数据集上,训练合成数据的模型在几何对齐方面表现更优(归一化互信息:0.31 vs 0.22),尽管传统强度评分较低。强度指标显示了对变形注册数据的逆相关性,而归一化互信息在不同注册方法中一致预测了观察者的偏好(rho = 0.31,p < 0.001)。临床观察者在87%的情况下更喜欢合成训练输出,这表明几何保真度,而不是与有偏地面真实值的强度一致,符合临床需求。

英文摘要:

Supervised synthetic CT generation from CBCT requires registered training pairs, yet perfect registration between separately acquired scans remains unattainable. This registration bias propagates into trained models and corrupts standard evaluation metrics. This may suggest that superior benchmark performance indicates better reproduction of registration artifacts rather than anatomical fidelity. We propose physics-based CBCT simulation to provide geometrically aligned training pairs by construction, combined with evaluation using geometric alignment metrics against input CBCT rather than biased ground truth. On two independent pelvic datasets, models trained on synthetic data achieved superior geometric alignment (Normalized Mutual Information: 0.31 vs 0.22) despite lower conventional intensity scores. Intensity metrics showed inverted correlations with clinical assessment for deformably registered data, while Normalized Mutual Information consistently predicted observer preference across registration methodologies (rho = 0.31, p < 0.001). Clinical observers preferred synthetic-trained outputs in 87% of cases, demonstrating that geometric fidelity, not intensity agreement with biased ground truth, aligns with clinical requirements.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑