arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.00699cs.AIcs.CLcs.IR
收藏

从提示到图:比较基于大语言模型的信息提取策略在领域特定本体构建中的应用

From Prompt to Graph: Comparing LLM-Based Information Extraction Strategies in Domain-Specific Ontology Development

National University of Singapore(新加坡国立大学);Comptech i Skillingaryd AB(Comptech i Skillingaryd AB公司);Lappeenranta University of Technology(拉彭兰塔理工大学);California State University Northridge(加州州立大学北岭分校)

Xuan Liu, Ziyu Li, Mu He, Ziyang Ma, Xiaoxu Wu, Gizem Yilmaz, Yiyuan Xia, Bingbing Li, He Tan, Jerry Ying Hsi Fuh, Wen Feng Lu, Anders E. W. Jarfors, Per Jansson

AI总结:

本文比较了三种基于大语言模型的信息提取策略,用于在有限数据下构建领域特定本体,通过实验验证了最佳方法的有效性。

摘要:

本体对于结构化领域知识、提高可访问性、共享性和可重用性至关重要。然而,传统本体构建依赖于手动标注和传统自然语言处理(NLP)技术,使过程劳动密集且成本高昂,尤其是在铸造制造等专业领域。大语言模型(LLMs)的兴起为自动化知识提取提供了新可能。本研究调查了三种基于LLM的方法,包括预训练LLM驱动方法、上下文学习(ICL)方法和微调方法,用于在有限数据下从领域特定文本中提取术语和关系。我们比较了它们的性能,并使用表现最好的方法构建了一个铸造本体,该本体经领域专家验证。

英文摘要:

Ontologies are essential for structuring domain knowledge, improving accessibility, sharing, and reuse. However, traditional ontology construction relies on manual annotation and conventional natural language processing (NLP) techniques, making the process labour-intensive and costly, especially in specialised fields like casting manufacturing. The rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) offers new possibilities for automating knowledge extraction. This study investigates three LLM-based approaches, including pre-trained LLM-driven method, in-context learning (ICL) method and fine-tuning method to extract terms and relations from domain-specific texts using limited data. We compare their performances and use the best-performing method to build a casting ontology that validated by domian expert.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑