arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2601.18525cs.LGcs.CV

弥合模态差距以对齐群体语义

Closing the Modality Gap Aligns Group-Wise Semantics

Department of Information Engineering, Electronics, and Telecommunications(信息工程、电子与电信系)

Eleonora Grassucci, Giordano Cicchetti, Emanuele Frasca, Aurelio Uncini, Danilo Comminiello

AI总结:

本文提出了一种方法,证明模态差距在群体级任务中显著影响性能,而非实例级任务。

摘要:

在多模态学习中,CLIP已被认为是学习跨多种模态的共享潜在空间的实际上方法,将相似的表示放得更近,而将不相似的放得更远。尽管基于CLIP的损失函数在语义层面有效对齐了模态,但所得到的潜在空间往往仍然只部分共享,揭示出一种称为模态差距的结构不匹配。虽然解决这一现象的必要性仍存在争议,尤其是在其对实例级任务(如检索)影响有限的情况下,我们证明其影响实际上在群体级任务(如聚类)中表现得尤为显著。为了支持这一主张,我们引入了一种新的方法,旨在在双模态设置中一致减少这种差异,并且可以简单地扩展到一般的n模态情况。通过我们的广泛评估,我们证明了我们的新见解:虽然减少差距在传统实例级任务中只提供微小或不一致的改进,但显著提升了群体级任务的表现。这些发现可能改变我们对模态差距的理解,突显其在需要语义分组的任务中的关键作用。

英文摘要:

In multimodal learning, CLIP has been recognized as the \textit{de facto} method for learning a shared latent space across multiple modalities, placing similar representations close to each other and moving them away from dissimilar ones. Although CLIP-based losses effectively align modalities at the semantic level, the resulting latent spaces often remain only partially shared, revealing a structural mismatch known as the modality gap. While the necessity of addressing this phenomenon remains debated, particularly given its limited impact on instance-wise tasks (e.g., retrieval), we prove that its influence is instead strongly pronounced in group-level tasks (e.g., clustering). To support this claim, we introduce a novel method designed to consistently reduce this discrepancy in two-modal settings, with a straightforward extension to the general $n$-modal case. Through our extensive evaluation, we demonstrate our novel insight: while reducing the gap provides only marginal or inconsistent improvements in traditional instance-wise tasks, it significantly enhances group-wise tasks. These findings may reshape our understanding of the modality gap, highlighting its key role in improving performance on tasks requiring semantic grouping.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑