arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2601.16355cs.CL
收藏

身份、合作与群体中真实与模拟人类的框架效应

Identity, Cooperation and Framing Effects within Groups of Real and Simulated Humans

University of California, Berkeley(加州大学伯克利分校);Google DeepMind(谷歌DeepMind)

Suhong Moon, Minwoo Kang, Joseph Suh, Mustafa Safdari, John Canny

AI总结:

本研究通过深度绑定基础模型与扩展背景故事,提升LLMs在社会困境游戏中模拟人类行为的保真度,探索影响人类研究的细节因素。

摘要:

人类的行为是一种复杂的过程,既依赖理性推理,也依赖身份和情境因素。在本工作中,我们研究了大型语言模型(LLMs)如何在社会困境游戏中模拟人类行为。尽管先前的研究集中在通过“引导”(弱绑定)聊天模型来模拟角色,我们在这里分析了深度绑定基础模型与扩展背景故事如何导致更忠实复制基于身份的行为。我们的研究得出以下结论:通过将基础LMs与丰富的叙述身份上下文进行条件,并使用指令调优模型检查一致性,可以提高模拟保真度与人类研究的对比。我们还表明,LLMs可以建模诸如时间(研究进行的年份)、问题框架和参与者池效应等情境因素。因此,LLMs使我们能够探索影响人类研究但常被实验描述所忽略的细节,这些细节阻碍了准确复制。

英文摘要:

Humans act via a nuanced process that depends both on rational deliberation and also on identity and contextual factors. In this work, we study how large language models (LLMs) can simulate human action in the context of social dilemma games. While prior work has focused on "steering" (weak binding) of chat models to simulate personas, we analyze here how deep binding of base models with extended backstories leads to more faithful replication of identity-based behaviors. Our study has these findings: simulation fidelity vs human studies is improved by conditioning base LMs with rich context of narrative identities and checking consistency using instruction-tuned models. We show that LLMs can also model contextual factors such as time (year that a study was performed), question framing, and participant pool effects. LLMs, therefore, allow us to explore the details that affect human studies but which are often omitted from experiment descriptions, and which hamper accurate replication.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑