arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2601.14101cs.CV

基于课程学习的跨领域动作识别高效策略

Curriculum-Based Strategies for Efficient Cross-Domain Action Recognition

Carnegie Mellon University(卡内基梅隆大学)

Emily Kim, Allen Wu, Jessica Hodgins

AI总结:

本文提出基于课程学习的跨领域动作识别方法,通过合成和真实数据结合提升模型泛化能力,显著减少训练迭代次数。

摘要:

尽管在人类动作识别方面取得了显著进展,但将其推广到多样化的视角仍是一个挑战。大多数现有数据集都是从地面视角拍摄的,训练这些数据集的模型往往难以迁移到如高空视角等截然不同的领域。本文探讨了基于课程学习的训练策略如何在不使用任何真实高空数据进行训练的情况下,提高对未见过的真实高空数据的泛化能力。我们探索了使用两种非领域数据源进行跨视角动作识别的课程学习:合成高空数据和真实地面数据。我们在训练顺序评估上发现,使用真实地面数据进行微调但过渡方式不同。第一种使用两阶段课程,直接微调;第二种采用渐进课程,先扩展数据集多个阶段再微调。我们在REMAG数据集上使用SlowFast(基于CNN)和MViTv2(基于Transformer)架构评估了两种方法。结果表明,结合两种非领域数据集明显优于仅训练单一领域,无论是真实地面视角还是合成高空视角。两种课程策略在保持简单数据集组合的top-1准确率的同时,提供了效率提升。使用两步微调方法,SlowFast的迭代次数减少高达37%,MViTv2减少高达30%。多步骤渐进方法进一步减少迭代次数,相对于两步方法,SlowFast减少高达9%,MViTv2减少高达30%。这些发现表明,基于课程的训练可以在跨视角动作识别中保持相当的性能(top-1准确率在3%范围内)的同时,提高训练效率。

英文摘要:

Despite significant progress in human action recognition, generalizing to diverse viewpoints remains a challenge. Most existing datasets are captured from ground-level perspectives, and models trained on them often struggle to transfer to drastically different domains such as aerial views. This paper examines how curriculum-based training strategies can improve generalization to unseen real aerial-view data without using any real aerial data during training. We explore curriculum learning for cross-view action recognition using two out-of-domain sources: synthetic aerial-view data and real ground-view data. Our results on the evaluation on order of training (fine-tuning on synthetic aerial data vs. real ground data) shows that fine-tuning on real ground data but differ in how they transition from synthetic to real. The first uses a two-stage curriculum with direct fine-tuning, while the second applies a progressive curriculum that expands the dataset in multiple stages before fine-tuning. We evaluate both methods on the REMAG dataset using SlowFast (CNN-based) and MViTv2 (Transformer-based) architectures. Results show that combining the two out-of-domain datasets clearly outperforms training on a single domain, whether real ground-view or synthetic aerial-view. Both curriculum strategies match the top-1 accuracy of simple dataset combination while offering efficiency gains. With the two-step fine-tuning method, SlowFast achieves up to a 37% reduction in iterations and MViTv2 up to a 30% reduction compared to simple combination. The multi-step progressive approach further reduces iterations, by up to 9% for SlowFast and 30% for MViTv2, relative to the two-step method. These findings demonstrate that curriculum-based training can maintain comparable performance (top-1 accuracy within 3% range) while improving training efficiency in cross-view action recognition.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑