arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2601.08064cs.CL
收藏

校准还不够:评估语言变化下的置信度估计

Calibration Is Not Enough: Evaluating Confidence Estimation Under Language Variations

Faculty of Computer Science, UniVie Doctoral School Computer Science(计算机科学系,维也纳大学计算机科学博士学院);Faculty of Philological and Cultural Studies, University of Vienna, Austria(文学与文化研究系,维也纳大学,奥地利);ILLC, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands(阿姆斯特丹大学ILLC,荷兰);Khoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, USA(东北大学计算机科学学院,美国);LMU Munich, Munich Center for Machine Learning (MCML), Germany(慕尼黑大学,慕尼黑机器学习中心(MCML),德国)

Yuxi Xia, Dennis Ulmer, Terra Blevins, Yihong Liu, Hinrich Schütze, Benjamin Roth

AI总结:

提出一个基于鲁棒性、稳定性和敏感性的新评估框架,揭示现有置信度估计方法在区分语义不同答案方面的不足。

摘要:

置信度估计(CE)指示大型语言模型答案的可靠性,影响用户信任和决策。现有评估主要关注置信度与正确性之间的一致性,但忽略了语言的可变性:置信度估计应在语义等价的提示或答案变体下保持一致,而在答案含义不同时发生变化,因为这可能表明正确性的变化。因此,我们引入了一个基于三个互补属性的新评估框架:对提示扰动的 extbf{鲁棒性}、跨语义等价答案的 extbf{稳定性}以及对语义不同答案的 extbf{敏感性}。我们表明这些指标与现有CE指标在很大程度上独立,并且常见的CE方法往往在这些指标上失败:虽然大多数方法实现了高鲁棒性和稳定性,但它们难以区分语义不同的答案,可能是因为它们没有有效利用生成侧信息。总体而言,我们的框架揭示了当前CE评估中被忽视的局限性,并为现实应用中选择置信度估计器提供了指导。

英文摘要:

Confidence estimation (CE) indicates how reliable the answers of large language models are and impacts user trust and decision-making. Existing evaluations mainly concern the alignment between confidence and correctness, but ignore the variability of language: confidence estimates should remain consistent under semantically equivalent prompts or answer variations, while changing when answer meaning differs, as this may indicate a change in correctness. Therefore, we introduce a novel evaluation framework based on three complementary properties: \textbf{robustness} to prompt perturbations, \textbf{stability} across semantically equivalent answers, and \textbf{sensitivity} to semantically different answers. We show that these metrics are largely independent from existing CE metrics, and that common CE methods often fail on them: while most methods achieve high robustness and stability, they struggle to distinguish semantically different answers, potentially because they do not effectively leverage generation-side information. Overall, our framework exposes overlooked limitations of current CE evaluations and provides guidance for selecting confidence estimators for real-world applications.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑