arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2601.05302cs.AI

人格引导对大型语言模型代理合作行为的影响

Effects of personality steering on cooperative behavior in Large Language Model agents

Mizuki Sakai, Mizuki Yokoyama, Wakaba Tateishi, Genki Ichinose

AI总结:

本研究通过囚徒困境实验发现,宜人性是促进大型语言模型合作的主要因素,而其他人格特质影响有限,且显式人格信息可能增加被利用的风险。

摘要:

大型语言模型(LLMs)正越来越多地被用作在战略和社会互动中自主的代理。尽管最近的研究表明,给LLMs分配人格特质可以影响其行为,但人格引导在受控条件下如何影响合作仍不明确。在本研究中,我们通过重复的囚徒困境游戏,研究了人格引导对LLM代理合作行为的影响。基于Big Five框架,我们首先使用Big Five Inventory测量三个模型的基本人格分数,即GPT-3.5-turbo、GPT-4o和GPT-5。然后我们比较了在基准条件和人格信息条件下行为的差异,并进一步分析了单独操纵每个个性维度到极端值的影响。我们的结果表明,宜人性是促进所有模型合作的主导因素,而其他人格特质影响有限。显式的人格信息会增加合作,但也可能提高被利用的脆弱性,尤其是在早期版本的模型中。相比之下,后期版本的模型表现出更具选择性的合作。这些发现表明,人格引导作为一种行为偏差,而非确定性控制机制。

英文摘要:

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as autonomous agents in strategic and social interactions. Although recent studies suggest that assigning personality traits to LLMs can influence their behavior, how personality steering affects cooperation under controlled conditions remains unclear. In this study, we examine the effects of personality steering on cooperative behavior in LLM agents using repeated Prisoner's Dilemma games. Based on the Big Five framework, we first measure basic personality scores of three models, GPT-3.5-turbo, GPT-4o, and GPT-5, using the Big Five Inventory. We then compare behavior under baseline and personality-informed conditions, and further analyze the effects of independently manipulating each personality dimension to extreme values. Our results show that agreeableness is the dominant factor promoting cooperation across all models, while other personality traits have limited impact. Explicit personality information increases cooperation but can also raise vulnerability to exploitation, particularly in earlier-generation models. In contrast, later-generation models exhibit more selective cooperation. These findings indicate that personality steering acts as a behavioral bias rather than a deterministic control mechanism.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑