arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2601.03791cs.CLcs.AI

大型语言模型真的会记忆个人身份信息吗?基于提示控制的记忆框架重新审视PII泄露

Do LLMs Really Memorize Personally Identifiable Information? Revisiting PII Leakage with a Cue-Controlled Memorization Framework

Department of Computer Science(计算机科学系);Department of Electronic Systems(电子系统系)

Xiaoyu Luo, Yiyi Chen, Qiongxiu Li, Johannes Bjerva

AI总结:

本文通过提示控制框架重新评估LLMs的PII泄露现象,发现其泄露更多由提示驱动而非真实记忆,强调了提示控制在隐私保护中的重要性。

摘要:

大型语言模型(LLMs)已被报告存在

英文摘要:

Large Language Models (LLMs) have been reported to "leak" Personally Identifiable Information (PII), with successful PII reconstruction often interpreted as evidence of memorization. We propose a principled revision of memorization evaluation for LLMs, arguing that PII leakage should be evaluated under low lexical cue conditions, where target PII cannot be reconstructed through prompt-induced generalization or pattern completion. We formalize Cue-Resistant Memorization (CRM) as a cue-controlled evaluation framework and a necessary condition for valid memorization evaluation, explicitly conditioning on prompt-target overlap cues. Using CRM, we conduct a large-scale multilingual re-evaluation of PII leakage across 32 languages and multiple memorization paradigms. Revisiting reconstruction-based settings, including verbatim prefix-suffix completion and associative reconstruction, we find that their apparent effectiveness is driven primarily by direct surface-form cues rather than by true memorization. When such cues are controlled for, reconstruction success diminishes substantially. We further examine cue-free generation and membership inference, both of which exhibit extremely low true positive rates. Overall, our results suggest that previously reported PII leakage is better explained by cue-driven behavior than by genuine memorization, highlighting the importance of cue-controlled evaluation for reliably quantifying privacy-relevant memorization in LLMs.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑