arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
北美退伍军人节(Veterans Day),12 日无更新
arXiv 2601.00829cs.CV
收藏

生成模型真的能伪造逼真的身份文件吗?

Can Generative Models Actually Forge Realistic Identity Documents?

IU International University of Applied Science(IU国际应用科学大学)

Alexander Vinogradov

AI总结:

本文研究了生成模型伪造身份文件的能力,发现其在结构真实性上不足,强调跨领域合作的重要性。

摘要:

生成图像模型最近在图像真实感方面取得了显著进展,导致公众对它们可能被用于伪造文件的潜在用途表示担忧。本文探讨了当前开源和公开可访问的扩散基生成模型是否能够生成身份文件伪造物,这些伪造物可能在人类或自动化验证系统中难以被识别。我们使用多个公开可用的生成模型家族,包括Stable Diffusion、Qwen、Flux、Nano-Banana等,评估文本到图像和图像到图像的生成管道。研究发现,尽管当前生成模型能够模拟表面文档的美学特征,但它们无法复现结构和鉴真真实性。因此,生成身份文件深度伪造达到鉴真级别真实性的风险可能被高估,强调了机器学习从业者与文档鉴真专家在现实风险评估中的合作价值。

英文摘要:

Generative image models have recently shown significant progress in image realism, leading to public concerns about their potential misuse for document forgery. This paper explores whether contemporary open-source and publicly accessible diffusion-based generative models can produce identity document forgeries that could realistically bypass human or automated verification systems. We evaluate text-to-image and image-to-image generation pipelines using multiple publicly available generative model families, including Stable Diffusion, Qwen, Flux, Nano-Banana, and others. The findings indicate that while current generative models can simulate surface-level document aesthetics, they fail to reproduce structural and forensic authenticity. Consequently, the risk of generative identity document deepfakes achieving forensic-level authenticity may be overestimated, underscoring the value of collaboration between machine learning practitioners and document-forensics experts in realistic risk assessment.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑