arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2512.19084cs.AI

$γ(3,4)$ 注意力在认知代理中的应用:基于承诺理论语义的知识表示

$γ(3,4)$ `Attention' in Cognitive Agents: Ontology-Free Knowledge Representations With Promise Theoretic Semantics

Oslo University College Chitek-i AS(奥斯陆大学学院奇特克-艾公司)

Mark Burgess

AI总结:

本文提出基于承诺理论语义的$γ(3,4)$图表示方法,通过特征角色分类替代复杂本体,提升不确定性条件下的推理效率。

摘要:

`attention`的语义和动态与为自主代理开发的承诺理论概念密切相关,因此可以很容易地在承诺框架中写出。通过这种方式,可以建立向量化的机器学习与知识图谱表示之间的桥梁,而无需隐式依赖语言模型。我们对知识的期望假定了一定的统计稳定性,即在重复观察下的平均不变性,或对数据的`信任`。学习网络和知识图谱表示可以有意义地共存,以保留数据的不同方面。虽然向量数据对概率估计很有用,但图谱在数据碎片化下仍能保留源意的意图性。使用语义时空$γ(3,4)$图,可以避免复杂的本体,转而通过特征在语义过程中的角色进行分类。后者倾向于在不确定性条件下进行推理的方法。适当关注因果边界条件可能使数据需求在自主机器人、防御部署和应急服务等情境中减少多个数量级。

英文摘要:

The semantics and dynamics of `attention' are closely related to promise theoretic notions developed for autonomous agents and can thus easily be written down in promise framework. In this way one may establish a bridge between vectorized Machine Learning and Knowledge Graph representations without relying on language models implicitly. Our expectations for knowledge presume a degree of statistical stability, i.e. average invariance under repeated observation, or `trust' in the data. Both learning networks and knowledge graph representations can meaningfully coexist to preserve different aspects of data. While vectorized data are useful for probabilistic estimation, graphs preserve the intentionality of the source even under data fractionation. Using a Semantic Spacetime $γ(3,4)$ graph, one avoids complex ontologies in favour of classification of features by their roles in semantic processes. The latter favours an approach to reasoning under conditions of uncertainty. Appropriate attention to causal boundary conditions may lead to orders of magnitude compression of data required for such context determination, as required in the contexts of autonomous robotics, defence deployments, and ad hoc emergency services.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑