arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2512.03479cs.CV

ProcObject-10K:面向教学视频中以对象为中心的程序理解的基准测试

ProcObject-10K: Benchmarking Object-Centric Procedural Understanding in Instructional Videos

Michigan State University(密歇根州立大学)

Wenliang Guo, Yu Kong

AI总结:

本文提出ProcObject-10K,首个评估教学视频中以对象为中心推理和时间证据定位的基准,涵盖137个任务和五种推理类型,揭示模型在对象动态理解上的不足。

摘要:

程序活动本质上由对象状态转换驱动,但现有教学视频基准仍以动作为中心,无法评估模型是否能推理对象如何向任务完成演变。本文引入ProcObject-10K,首个联合评估教学视频中以对象为中心推理和时间证据定位的基准,包含10,522个开放性VideoQA对,涵盖137个任务和五个推理类型。基准测试13个领先MLLMs揭示显著的回答-证据差距:模型生成合理答案但无法局部化支持证据(mIoU<45%),暴露其依赖语言先验而非细粒度对象动态。作为缩小这一差距的一步,本文进一步提供以对象为中心的监督微调基线,结合伪对象级监督和时空约束。在ProcObject-10K上微调的模型不仅在基准本身上有所提升,还能有效迁移到其他 grounded VideoQA 和 embodied planning 任务。数据集、标注和评估工具包将公开发布以支持未来关于以对象为中心的程序理解的研究。

英文摘要:

Procedural activities are fundamentally driven by object state transitions, yet existing instructional video benchmarks remain action-centric and cannot evaluate whether models reason about how objects evolve toward task completion. In this work, we introduce ProcObject-10K, the first benchmark that jointly evaluates object-centric reasoning and temporal evidence grounding in instructional videos, across both egocentric and exocentric views. It comprises 10,522 open-ended VideoQA pairs grounded in 1,799 video clips, spanning 137 tasks across 9 domains and five reasoning types covering preconditions, state evolution, counterfactuals, mistakes, and readiness. Benchmarking 13 leading MLLMs reveals a substantial answering-grounding gap: models produce plausible answers while failing to localize the supporting evidence (mIoU < 45%), exposing their reliance on linguistic priors rather than fine-grained object dynamics. As a step toward closing this gap, we further provide an object-centric supervised fine-tuning baseline with pseudo object-level supervision and spatial-temporal constraints. Models fine-tuned on ProcObject-10K not only improve on the benchmark itself, but also transfer effectively to other grounded VideoQA and embodied planning tasks. The dataset, annotations, and evaluation toolkit will be publicly released to support future research on object-centric procedural understanding.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑