arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2511.08092eess.AScs.CLcs.SD

剪枝作为正则化:ASR 中敏感度感知的一次性剪枝

Pruning as Regularization: Sensitivity-Aware One-Shot Pruning in ASR

Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, Denmark(哥本哈根商学院);Jabra (GN Group), Copenhagen, Denmark(Jabra(GN集团))

Julian Irigoyen, Arthur Söhler, Andreas Søeborg Kirkedal

AI总结:

本文挑战剪枝仅用于压缩的观点,提出敏感度感知的一次性剪枝作为 ASR 隐式正则化器,通过识别架构冗余,在不微调下提升泛化并实现更激进压缩,证明剪枝位置与数量同等重要。

摘要:

我们挑战了将神经网络剪枝仅视为压缩技术的传统观点,证明一次性幅度剪枝可作为 ASR 的强隐式正则化器。使用 Whisper-small,我们将基于梯度和 Fisher 的敏感度诊断与有针对性的、组件级剪枝相结合。这揭示了架构不对称性:解码器 FFN 对剪枝敏感,而解码器自注意力和最后编码器层包含冗余,移除这些冗余可改善泛化。无需微调,在 LibriSpeech test-other 上剪枝 50% 的解码器自注意力可将 WER 绝对降低 2.38%(相对降低 20.44%);剪枝最后四个编码器层 50% 反而带来 1.72% 绝对(14.8% 相对)的改进。在 Common Voice 和 TED-LIUM 数据集上增益持续存在。除了正则化益处,我们的敏感度感知方法还能实现更激进的一次性压缩。在 40% 稀疏度下,已建立的全局剪枝方法灾难性失败,而我们的方法保持接近基线的准确性。这将剪枝定位为一流的架构设计工具:知道在哪里剪枝与剪枝多少同样重要。

英文摘要:

We challenge the conventional view of neural network pruning as solely a compression technique, demonstrating that one-shot magnitude pruning serves as a powerful implicit regularizer for ASR. Using Whisper-small, we combine gradient- and Fisher-based sensitivity diagnostics with targeted, component-wise pruning. This reveals architectural asymmetries: decoder FFNs are pruning-fragile, whereas decoder self-attention and the last encoder layers contain redundancy that, when removed, improves generalization. Without fine-tuning, pruning 50% of decoder self-attention reduces WER by 2.38% absolute (20.44% relative) on LibriSpeech test-other; pruning the last four encoder layers at 50% instead yields a 1.72% absolute (14.8% relative) improvement. Gains persisted on Common Voice and TED-LIUM datasets. Beyond regularization benefits, our sensitivity-aware approach enables more aggressive one-shot compression. At 40% sparsity, where established global pruning approaches catastrophically fail, our method preserves near-baseline accuracy. This positions pruning as a first-class architectural design tool: knowing where to prune is as important as how much to prune.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑