arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2511.08066cs.AIcs.CLeess.SP
收藏

信息容量:通过文本压缩评估大语言模型的效率

Information Capacity: Evaluating the Efficiency of Large Language Models via Text Compression

Cheng Yuan, Jiawei Shao, Xuelong Li

AI总结:

本文提出信息容量作为评估大语言模型效率的新指标,通过文本压缩性能与计算复杂性关系衡量模型效率,并揭示主流模型的语言偏见问题。

摘要:

近年来,大型语言模型(LLMs)及其应用的快速进步导致了对计算资源的日益增长的需求。测试时间扩展的广泛应用进一步加剧了模型能力和资源消耗之间的矛盾。然而,一个能够准确反映LLM在不同分词器、参数数量和模型架构下的推理效率的严格度量指标仍然缺失。受压缩与智能之间的相关性启发,我们引入了信息容量,这是一种基于文本压缩性能与计算复杂性之间关系的模型效率度量标准。信息容量的一个显著特点是其纳入了分词器效率,这会影响推理成本,但通常在LLM评估中被忽视。我们评估了56个开源模型的信息容量,并观察到在同一系列中不同大小的模型具有一致的信息容量。在五个异构数据集上的实验揭示了主流LLM存在强烈的语言偏见。实证结果验证了基于信息容量的模型大小性能预测的准确性,并展示了信息容量与基准分数之间的相关性。该度量标准可用于量化推理效率的改进,并为未来LLM的发展提供更好的扩展性能见解。

英文摘要:

Recent years have witnessed the rapid advancements of large language models (LLMs) and their expanding applications, leading to soaring demands for computational resources. The widespread adoption of test-time scaling further intensifies the tension between model capability and resource consumption. However, a rigorous metric that accurately reflects an LLM's inference efficiency across diverse tokenizers, parameter counts, and model architectures remains absent. Motivated by the correlation between compression and intelligence, we introduce information capacity, a measure of model efficiency based on text compression performance relative to computational complexity. A distinctive feature of information capacity is its incorporation of tokenizer efficiency, which affects inference costs but is often neglected in LLM evaluations. We assess the information capacity of 56 open-source models and observe a consistent information capacity among different-sized models within a series. Experiments on five heterogeneous datasets reveal strong linguistic biases in mainstream LLMs. Empirical results verify the accuracy of performance prediction across model sizes based on information capacity and show the correlation between information capacity and benchmark scores. This metric can be used to quantify improvements in inference efficiency and provide insights into better scaling performance for future LLM development.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑