arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
北美退伍军人节(Veterans Day),12 日无更新
arXiv 2510.09080cs.ROcs.AIcs.HC
收藏

训练模型从人类反应中检测连续机器人错误

Training Models to Detect Successive Robot Errors from Human Reactions

Cornell University(康奈尔大学)

Shannon Liu, Maria Teresa Parreira, Wendy Ju

AI总结:

本研究利用机器学习从人类反应中识别机器人连续失败阶段,最佳模型错误检测准确率93.5%,连续失败分类准确率84.1%,提升了人机交互中的错误检测能力。

摘要:

随着机器人越来越融入社会,检测机器人错误对于有效的人机交互(HRI)至关重要。当机器人反复失败时,它如何知道何时改变其行为?人类自然地通过言语和非言语线索对机器人错误做出反应,这些线索随着连续失败而加剧——从困惑和微妙的言语变化到明显的沮丧和不耐烦。虽然先前的研究表明人类反应可以指示机器人故障,但很少有研究探讨这些不断演变的反应如何揭示连续失败。本研究利用机器学习从人类反应中识别机器人失败的阶段。在一项涉及26名参与者与一个制造重复对话错误的机器人互动的实验中,从视频数据中提取行为特征以训练针对个体用户的模型。最佳模型在检测错误方面达到了93.5%的准确率,在分类连续失败方面达到了84.1%的准确率。对人类反应进展的建模增强了错误检测和对HRI中重复交互中断的理解。

英文摘要:

As robots become more integrated into society, detecting robot errors is essential for effective human-robot interaction (HRI). When a robot fails repeatedly, how can it know when to change its behavior? Humans naturally respond to robot errors through verbal and nonverbal cues that intensify over successive failures-from confusion and subtle speech changes to visible frustration and impatience. While prior work shows that human reactions can indicate robot failures, few studies examine how these evolving responses reveal successive failures. This research uses machine learning to recognize stages of robot failure from human reactions. In a study with 26 participants interacting with a robot that made repeated conversational errors, behavioral features were extracted from video data to train models for individual users. The best model achieved 93.5% accuracy for detecting errors and 84.1% for classifying successive failures. Modeling the progression of human reactions enhances error detection and understanding of repeated interaction breakdowns in HRI.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑