arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2510.07191cs.CVcs.AIcs.LG

分辨率缩放决定了DINOv3在胸部X光分类中的转移性能

Resolution scaling governs DINOv3 transfer performance in chest radiograph classification

Lab for AI in Medicine, RWTH Aachen University(人工智能医学实验室,亚琛工业大学);Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen(诊断与介入放射学部门,亚琛大学医院);Department of Urology, Stanford University(泌尿科,斯坦福大学);Department of Radiology, Stanford University(放射科,斯坦福大学);Institute for Computational Genomics, Joint Research Center for Computational Biomedicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen(计算基因组研究所,计算生物医学联合研究中心,亚琛大学医院);Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden(数字健康中心,德累斯顿技术大学);Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Dresden(第一医学部,德累斯顿大学医院);National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg(肿瘤疾病国家中心(NCT),海德堡大学医院)

Soroosh Tayebi Arasteh, Mina Shaigan, Christiane Kuhl, Jakob Nikolas Kather, Sven Nebelung, Daniel Truhn

AI总结:

本文评估了DINOv3在胸部X光分类中的性能,发现其在512x512像素下表现最佳,尤其在ConvNeXt-B模型中,但高分辨率1024x1024并未带来显著提升,反而增加计算成本。

摘要:

自监督学习(SSL)已改善了视觉表示学习,但在胸部X光中的价值仍存疑。DINOv3通过Gram-锚定自蒸馏和显式高分辨率适应扩展了早期SSL模型。是否这些改进能提升胸部X光分类的迁移学习尚未确定。我们对比了DINOv3与DINOv2及监督ImageNet初始化,测试了七个包含816,183张X光图像的数据集,涵盖儿童和成人队列。ViT-B/16和ConvNeXt-B在224和512像素下进行了全微调,针对三个队列进行了1024像素实验。此外分析了参数高效适应、合成标签腐败、外部验证、冻结7B特征和计算效率。主要结果是标签间的平均AUROC。在成人队列中,DINOv3在224x224像素下未始终优于DINOv2,但在512x512像素下成为最强初始化,尤其在ConvNeXt-B中。增益最大体现在小的病灶和边界依赖性异常,而大结构发现变化不大。儿童队列中DINOv3、更高分辨率或主干选择未显示显著益处。扩展到1024x1024很少改善性能,但显著增加计算成本。ConvNeXt-B在全适应和参数高效适应下均优于ViT-B/16。外部验证保持了512x512 DINOv3优势,但合成标签腐败显示此优势不应简单解释为更强的噪声鲁棒性。对于成人胸部X光分类,DINOv3在512x512像素下提供最可靠的益处,尤其在ConvNeXt-B中。全适应的中等大小模型在512x512像素下提供了最佳的性能-成本权衡。

英文摘要:

Self-supervised learning (SSL) has improved visual representation learning, but its value in chest radiography remains uncertain. DINOv3 extends earlier SSL models through Gram-anchored self-distillation and explicit high-resolution adaptation. Whether these changes improve transfer learning for chest radiograph classification has not been established. We benchmarked DINOv3 against DINOv2 and supervised ImageNet initialization across seven chest radiograph datasets comprising 816,183 radiographs from pediatric and adult cohorts. ViT-B/16 and ConvNeXt-B were evaluated under full fine-tuning at 224 and 512 pixels, with targeted 1024 experiments on three cohorts. Additional analyses examined parameter-efficient adaptation, synthetic label corruption, external validation, frozen 7B features, and computational efficiency. The primary outcome was mean AUROC across labels. In adult cohorts, DINOv3 did not consistently outperform DINOv2 at 224 x 224 pixels, but became the strongest initialization at 512 x 512, especially with ConvNeXt-B. Gains were greatest for small focal and boundary-dependent abnormalities, whereas large-structure findings changed little. The pediatric cohort showed no significant benefit from DINOv3, higher resolution, or backbone choice. Scaling to 1024 x 1024 rarely improved performance and markedly increased computational cost. ConvNeXt-B remained superior to ViT-B/16 under both full and parameter-efficient adaptation. External validation preserved the 512 x 512 DINOv3 advantage, whereas synthetic label corruption showed that this benefit should not be interpreted simply as superior noise robustness. For adult chest radiograph classification, DINOv3 provides its most reliable benefit at 512 x 512 pixels, particularly with ConvNeXt-B. Fully adapted mid-sized models at 512 x 512 pixels provided the best performance-cost trade-off in our benchmark.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑