arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
北美退伍军人节(Veterans Day),12 日无更新
arXiv 2510.04048cs.AI
收藏

使用投票集成提高LLM响应的可信度

Increasing LLM response trustworthiness using voting ensembles

Harvard University(哈佛大学);University of Pennsylvania(宾夕法尼亚大学);Massachusetts Institute of Technology(麻省理工学院)

Aparna Nair-Kanneganti, Trevor J. Chan, Shir Goldfinger, Emily Mackay, Brian Anthony, Alison Pouch

AI总结:

本研究提出可变投票阈值集成方法,允许模型在主导响应不足时弃权,以提升LLM答案可信度,并在算术和临床问答中验证了高可信度与适度产出损失的权衡。

摘要:

尽管取得了巨大进步,LLM仍然缺乏方便可靠的方法来量化其响应中的不确定性,这使得它们在高风险应用中难以被信任。获得更准确答案的最简单方法之一是选择多个响应的众数,这种技术被称为集成。在这项工作中,我们扩展了典型的集成方法,研究了具有可变投票阈值的集成。我们引入了一个用于问答的理论框架,并表明,当主导响应未达到阈值时,允许集成“弃权(不执行)”提供答案,可以显著提高剩余答案的可信度。基于该框架,我们推导了理论结果,并在两个问题领域报告了实验结果:算术问题求解和临床笔记问答。在这两个领域中,我们观察到,使用高度限制性的投票集成可以实现答案可信度的大幅提升,同时仅导致响应产出率和准确性的相对适度降低。由于这一特性,投票集成在需要高度确定性但可能不需要每个问题都获得自动化答案的应用(如医疗保健和数据标注)中可能特别有用。

英文摘要:

Despite huge advances, LLMs still lack convenient and reliable methods to quantify the uncertainty in their responses, making them difficult to trust in high-stakes applications. One of the simplest approaches to eliciting more accurate answers is to select the mode of many responses, a technique known as ensembling. In this work, we expand on typical ensembling approaches by looking at ensembles with a variable voting threshold. We introduce a theoretical framework for question answering and show that, by permitting ensembles to "abstain" from providing an answer when the dominant response falls short of the threshold, it is possible to dramatically increase the trustworthiness of the remaining answers. From this framework, we derive theoretical results as well as report experimental results on two problem domains: arithmetic problem solving and clinical-note question-answering. In both domains, we observe that large gains in answer trustworthiness can be achieved using highly restrictive voting ensembles, while incurring relatively modest reductions in response yield and accuracy. Due to this quality, voting ensembles may be particularly useful in applications - such as healthcare and data annotation - that require a high degree of certainty but which may not require that every question receive an automated answer.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑