arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2602.22280cs.LGcs.AI
收藏

将机器学习集成与大型语言模型结合用于心脏病预测的投票融合

Integrating Machine Learning Ensembles and Large Language Models for Heart Disease Prediction Using Voting Fusion

Md. Tahsin Amin, Tanim Ahmmod, Zannatul Ferdus, Talukder Naemul Hasan Naem, Ehsanul Ferdous, Arpita Bhattacharjee, Ishmam Ahmed Solaiman, Nahiyan Bin Noor

AI总结:

本研究通过结合机器学习集成与大型语言模型的投票融合方法,提高了心脏病预测的准确性与可靠性。

摘要:

心血管疾病是全球主要的死亡原因,需要早期识别、精确的风险分类和可靠的决策支持技术。大型语言模型(LLMs)的出现提供了新的零样本和少样本推理能力,尽管机器学习(ML)算法,尤其是随机森林、XGBoost、LightGBM和CatBoost等集成方法,擅长建模复杂的非线性患者数据,并且通常优于逻辑回归。本研究使用1,190名患者的合并数据集预测心血管疾病,比较传统机器学习模型(准确率95.78%,ROC-AUC 0.96)与通过OpenRouter API访问的开源大型语言模型。最后,Gemini 2.5 Flash下的ML集成与LLM推理混合方法取得了最佳结果(准确率96.62%,AUC 0.97),表明LLMs(准确率78.9%)在与ML模型结合时表现最佳,而不是单独使用。结果显示,ML集成方法取得了最高性能(准确率95.78%,ROC-AUC 0.96),而LLMs在零样本设置中表现中等(78.9%),在少样本设置中稍好(72.6%)。所提出的混合方法增强了不确定情况下的能力,表明集成ML是最佳结构的表格预测案例,但可以与混合ML-LLM系统结合,提供小幅提升并打开更可靠的临床决策支持工具的途径。

英文摘要:

Cardiovascular disease is the primary cause of death globally, necessitating early identification, precise risk classification, and dependable decision-support technologies. The advent of large language models (LLMs) provides new zero-shot and few-shot reasoning capabilities, even though machine learning (ML) algorithms, especially ensemble approaches like Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost, are excellent at modeling complex, non-linear patient data and routinely beat logistic regression. This research predicts cardiovascular disease using a merged dataset of 1,190 patient records, comparing traditional machine learning models (95.78% accuracy, ROC-AUC 0.96) with open-source large language models via OpenRouter APIs. Finally, a hybrid fusion of the ML ensemble and LLM reasoning under Gemini 2.5 Flash achieved the best results (96.62% accuracy, 0.97 AUC), showing that LLMs (78.9 % accuracy) work best when combined with ML models rather than used alone. Results show that ML ensembles achieved the highest performance (95.78% accuracy, ROC-AUC 0.96), while LLMs performed moderately in zero-shot (78.9%) and slightly better in few-shot (72.6%) settings. The proposed hybrid method enhanced the strength in uncertain situations, illustrating that ensemble ML is considered the best structured tabular prediction case, but it can be integrated with hybrid ML-LLM systems to provide a minor increase and open the way to more reliable clinical decision-support tools.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑