arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2510.02668cs.IRcs.AI

AgenticRAG:面向零样本可解释推荐系统的工具增强基础模型

AgenticRAG: Tool-Augmented Foundation Models for Zero-Shot Explainable Recommender Systems

Department of Software \& Microelectronics Peking University Beijing, China;Department of Software \& Microelectronics Peking University Beijing, China hangli\;Department of Software \& Microelectronics Peking University Beijing, China zehua\;Department of Software \& Microelectronics Peking University Beijing, China xiaofan\;Economic Law School China University of Political Science;School of Computer Science Peking University Beijing, China

Bo Ma, Hang Li, ZeHua Hu, XiaoFan Gui, LuYao Liu, Simon Liu

AI总结:

针对基础模型在推荐系统中推理不透明、知识受限的问题,提出融合工具增强、检索增强与思维链的AgenticRAG框架,零样本下实现可解释推荐,在三个真实数据集上NDCG@10均优于现有基线且效率可比。

摘要:

基础模型已革新人工智能领域,但其在推荐系统中的应用仍受推理不透明性和知识局限性的制约。本文提出AgenticRAG这一新型框架,将工具增强基础模型与检索增强生成相结合,用于零样本可解释推荐。该方法整合外部工具调用、知识检索与思维链推理,构建无需任务特定训练即可实现透明决策的自主推荐智能体。在三个真实世界数据集上的实验结果表明,AgenticRAG相较现有最优基线取得持续提升:在Amazon Electronics数据集上NDCG@10提升0.4%,在MovieLens-1M上提升0.8%,在Yelp数据集上提升1.6%。该框架具备优异的可解释性,同时保持与传统方法相当的计算效率。

英文摘要:

Foundation models have revolutionized artificial intelligence, yet their application in recommender systems remains limited by reasoning opacity and knowledge constraints. This paper introduces AgenticRAG, a novel framework that combines tool-augmented foundation models with retrieval-augmented generation for zero-shot explainable recommendations. Our approach integrates external tool invocation, knowledge retrieval, and chain-of-thought reasoning to create autonomous recommendation agents capable of transparent decision-making without task-specific training. Experimental results on three real-world datasets demonstrate that AgenticRAG achieves consistent improvements over state-of-the-art baselines, with NDCG@10 improvements of 0.4\% on Amazon Electronics, 0.8\% on MovieLens-1M, and 1.6\% on Yelp datasets. The framework exhibits superior explainability while maintaining computational efficiency comparable to traditional methods.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑