arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2509.01409cs.LG

评估实例依赖成本敏感信用评分中模型解释的稳定性

Evaluating the stability of model explanations in instance-dependent cost-sensitive credit scoring

Ghent University(根特大学);CVAMO Core Lab(CVAMO核心实验室)

Matteo Ballegeer, Matthias Bogaert, Dries F. Benoit

AI总结:

本研究评估了实例依赖成本敏感(IDCS)信用评分模型中LIME和SHAP解释的稳定性,发现IDCS虽提升成本效率,但解释稳定性显著低于传统模型,凸显成本优化与可解释性的权衡及解决该问题的紧迫性。

摘要:

实例依赖成本敏感(IDCS)分类器通过针对特定实例成本定制损失函数,为提升信用评分的成本效率提供了一种有前景的方法。然而,尽管监管对透明度的要求日益提高,此类损失函数对模型解释稳定性的影响在现有文献中仍未被探究。本研究填补了这一空白,评估了局部可解释模型-不可知解释(Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations, LIME)和沙普利可加解释(SHapley Additive exPlanations, SHAP)应用于IDCS模型时的稳定性。我们使用四个公开的信用评分数据集,首先评估了IDCS分类器的判别能力和成本效率,并提出了一种新的度量指标以增强跨数据集可比性。随后,我们通过受控重采样,研究了在不同类别不平衡程度下,SHAP和LIME特征重要性排序的稳定性。结果表明,尽管IDCS分类器提升了成本效率,但与传统模型相比,其生成的解释稳定性显著更低,且随着类别不平衡程度加剧这一问题更突出,凸显了信用评分中成本优化与可解释性之间的关键权衡。在监管对可解释性审查日益严格的背景下,本研究强调了迫切需要解决IDCS分类器的稳定性问题,以确保其成本优势不会因不稳定或不可靠的解释而受损。

英文摘要:

Instance-dependent cost-sensitive (IDCS) classifiers offer a promising approach to improving cost-efficiency in credit scoring by tailoring loss functions to instance-specific costs. However, the impact of such loss functions on the stability of model explanations remains unexplored in literature, despite increasing regulatory demands for transparency. This study addresses this gap by evaluating the stability of Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) when applied to IDCS models. Using four publicly available credit scoring datasets, we first assess the discriminatory power and cost-efficiency of IDCS classifiers, introducing a novel metric to enhance cross-dataset comparability. We then investigate the stability of SHAP and LIME feature importance rankings under varying degrees of class imbalance through controlled resampling. Our results reveal that while IDCS classifiers improve cost-efficiency, they produce significantly less stable explanations compared to traditional models, particularly as class imbalance increases, highlighting a critical trade-off between cost optimization and interpretability in credit scoring. Amid increasing regulatory scrutiny on explainability, this research underscores the pressing need to address stability issues in IDCS classifiers to ensure that their cost advantages are not undermined by unstable or untrustworthy explanations.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑