arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2509.01351econ.EMmath.STstat.TH
收藏

Bootstrap诊断检验

Bootstrap Diagnostic Tests

Giuseppe Cavaliere, Luca Fanelli, Iliyan Georgiev

AI总结:

本文提出Bootstrap诊断检验,用于检测经典高斯极限理论假设的违反,该方法无预检验偏差、临界值统一且对偏离正态性一致,适用于弱工具变量等多种失效场景。

摘要:

经典(高斯)极限理论所依赖的假设若被违反,往往会导致不可靠的统计推断。本文表明,Bootstrap能够通过提供简单而有力的诊断检验来检测此类违反,这些检验(a)不会引起预检验偏差,(b)在不同应用中采用相同的临界值,以及(c)对偏离渐近正态性具有一致性。这些检验将Bootstrap统计量的条件分布与有效设定所隐含的高斯极限进行比较,并评估由此产生的差异是否大到足以表明渐近高斯近似失效。该方法计算简便,仅需Bootstrap统计量的一组i.i.d.样本。我们推导了充分条件,使得数据中的随机性与Bootstrap重复中的随机性以某种方式混合,从而使得上述(a)、(b)和(c)成立。我们通过考虑渐近高斯近似可能失效的几种情形来展示Bootstrap诊断的实际相关性和广泛适用性,这些情形包括弱工具变量、非平稳性、参数位于参数空间边界、无限方差数据以及delta方法应用中的奇异雅可比矩阵。最后,以实证宏观经济学文献中的一个示例作为结论。

英文摘要:

Violation of the assumptions underlying classical (Gaussian) limit theory often yields unreliable statistical inference. This paper shows that the bootstrap can detect such violations by delivering simple and powerful diagnostic tests that (a) induce no pre-testing bias, (b) use the same critical values across applications, and (c) are consistent against deviations from asymptotic normality. The tests compare the conditional distribution of a bootstrap statistic with the Gaussian limit implied by valid specification and assess whether the resulting discrepancy is large enough to indicate failure of the asymptotic Gaussian approximation. The method is computationally straightforward and only requires a sample of i.i.d. draws of the bootstrap statistic. We derive sufficient conditions for the randomness in the data to mix with the randomness in the bootstrap repetitions in a way such that (a), (b) and (c) above hold. We demonstrate the practical relevance and broad applicability of bootstrap diagnostics by considering several scenarios where the asymptotic Gaussian approximation may fail, including weak instruments, non-stationarity, parameters on the boundary of the parameter space, infinite variance data and singular Jacobian in applications of the delta method. An illustration drawn from the empirical macroeconomic literature concludes.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑