arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2508.05525cs.CLcs.AI

大型语言模型眼中的世界:地理来源如何影响其实体推断能力

The World According to LLMs: How Geographic Origin Influences LLMs' Entity Deduction Capabilities

BITS, Pilani(比哈尔理工学院);Georgia Institute of Technology(佐治亚理工学院);Stanford University(斯坦福大学);Emory University(埃默里大学)

Harsh Nishant Lalai, Raj Sanjay Shah, Jiaxin Pei, Sashank Varma, Yi-Chia Wang, Ali Emami

AI总结:

本研究通过20个问题游戏评估LLMs的实体推断能力,发现其存在显著的地理偏见:对全球北方和西方实体的推断成功率更高,且语言影响甚微,揭示了标准提示中隐藏的隐性偏见。

摘要:

大型语言模型(LLMs)已被广泛调整以减轻显性偏见,但它们常常表现出源于其预训练数据的微妙隐性偏见。我们不直接用可能触发防护栏的人工设计问题来探测LLMs,而是提出研究模型在主动提问时的行为方式。20个问题游戏,一个多轮推断任务,为此目的提供了理想的测试平台。我们使用一个新数据集Geo20Q+,系统性地评估了实体推断中的地理性能差异,该数据集包含来自不同地区的知名人物和文化重要物品(如食物、地标、动物)。我们在两种游戏配置(标准20问题和无限轮次)以及七种语言(英语、印地语、普通话、日语、法语、西班牙语和土耳其语)中测试了流行的LLMs。我们的结果揭示了地理差异:LLMs在推断来自全球北方的实体时比全球南方成功得多,在推断全球西方时比全球东方成功得多。虽然维基百科页面浏览量和预训练语料库频率与性能有轻微相关性,但它们无法完全解释这些差异。值得注意的是,游戏使用的语言对性能差距影响甚微。这些发现证明了创造性、自由形式的评估框架在揭示LLMs中在标准提示设置下仍然隐藏的微妙偏见方面的价值。通过分析模型如何在多轮中发起和追求推理目标,我们发现了嵌入在其推理过程中的地理和文化差异。我们在https://sites.google.com/view/llmbias20q/home发布了数据集(Geo20Q+)和代码。

英文摘要:

Large Language Models (LLMs) have been extensively tuned to mitigate explicit biases, yet they often exhibit subtle implicit biases rooted in their pre-training data. Rather than directly probing LLMs with human-crafted questions that may trigger guardrails, we propose studying how models behave when they proactively ask questions themselves. The 20 Questions game, a multi-turn deduction task, serves as an ideal testbed for this purpose. We systematically evaluate geographic performance disparities in entity deduction using a new dataset, Geo20Q+, consisting of both notable people and culturally significant objects (e.g., foods, landmarks, animals) from diverse regions. We test popular LLMs across two gameplay configurations (canonical 20-question and unlimited turns) and in seven languages (English, Hindi, Mandarin, Japanese, French, Spanish, and Turkish). Our results reveal geographic disparities: LLMs are substantially more successful at deducing entities from the Global North than the Global South, and the Global West than the Global East. While Wikipedia pageviews and pre-training corpus frequency correlate mildly with performance, they fail to fully explain these disparities. Notably, the language in which the game is played has minimal impact on performance gaps. These findings demonstrate the value of creative, free-form evaluation frameworks for uncovering subtle biases in LLMs that remain hidden in standard prompting setups. By analyzing how models initiate and pursue reasoning goals over multiple turns, we find geographic and cultural disparities embedded in their reasoning processes. We release the dataset (Geo20Q+) and code at https://sites.google.com/view/llmbias20q/home.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑