arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2601.04201cs.CLcs.AIcs.CYcs.HC

集体叙事 grounding:社区协调的数据贡献以改进本地 AI 系统

Collective Narrative Grounding: Community-Coordinated Data Contributions to Improve Local AI Systems

Information Science University of Wisconsin-Madison(信息科学大学威斯康星大学麦迪逊分校);Digital Media Georgia Tech(数字媒体佐治亚理工学院)

Zihan Gao, Mohsin Y. K. Yousufi, Jacob Thebault-Spieker

AI总结:

本文提出集体叙事 grounding 协议,通过社区协调的数据贡献,改进本地 AI 系统,解决社区特定查询的问答问题。

摘要:

大型语言模型(LLM)问答系统在处理社区特定查询时常常失败,导致

英文摘要:

Large language model (LLM) question-answering systems often fail on community-specific queries, creating "knowledge blind spots" that marginalize local voices and reinforce epistemic injustice. We present Collective Narrative Grounding, a participatory protocol that transforms community stories into structured narrative units and integrates them into AI systems under community governance. Learning from three participatory mapping workshops with N=24 community members, we designed elicitation methods and a schema that retain narrative richness while enabling entity, time, and place extraction, validation, and provenance control. To scope the problem, we audit a county-level benchmark of 14,782 local information QA pairs, where factual gaps, cultural misunderstandings, geographic confusions, and temporal misalignments account for 76.7% of errors. On a participatory QA set derived from our workshops, a state-of-the-art LLM answered fewer than 21% of questions correctly without added context, underscoring the need for local grounding. The missing facts often appear in the collected narratives, suggesting a direct path to closing the dominant error modes for narrative items. Beyond the protocol and pilot, we articulate key design tensions, such as representation and power, governance and control, and privacy and consent, providing concrete requirements for retrieval-first, provenance-visible, locally governed QA systems. Together, our taxonomy, protocol, and participatory evaluation offer a rigorous foundation for building community-grounded AI that better answers local questions.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑