arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2505.12896cs.CLcs.LGstat.ML

论大语言模型中的思维-语言建模差距

On the Thinking-Language Modeling Gap in Large Language Models

Hong Kong Baptist University(香港 Baptist 大学);MBZUAI Carnegie Mellon University(MBZUAI 美国卡内基梅隆大学);The University of Sydney(悉尼大学);The Chinese University of Hong Kong(香港中文大学)

Chenxi Liu, Yongqiang Chen, Tongliang Liu, James Cheng, Bo Han, Kun Zhang

AI总结:

本研究揭示大语言模型存在语言-思维建模差距,语言偏差会误导思维激发,提出LoT提示技术调整信息表达顺序与token,有效降低偏差并提升多类推理任务性能。

摘要:

系统2推理是智能的核心特征之一,需要缓慢且符合逻辑的思考。人类通过思维语言开展系统2推理,该语言将推理过程组织为心理语言即思维的因果序列。近期研究发现,在大规模自然语言上预训练的大语言模型(LLMs)可被激发出系统2推理能力。但本研究表明,语言建模与思维建模之间存在显著差距。由于语言本质上是人类共享知识与想法的工具,对人类语言的建模容易将语言偏差注入LLMs,使其偏离大脑中的思维链。此外我们发现,这些偏差会误导LLMs中“思维”的激发过程,使其仅关注前提中存在偏差的部分。为此,我们提出一种名为思维语言(Language-of-Thoughts, LoT)的新型提示技术,以验证并缓解这一差距。LoT并非从部分信息中直接激发思维链,而是指示LLMs调整所有相关信息表达的顺序和所用token。我们证明,这一简单策略显著降低了LLMs中的语言建模偏差,并提升了LLMs在多种推理任务上的性能。

英文摘要:

System 2 reasoning is one of the defining characteristics of intelligence, which requires slow and logical thinking. Human conducts System 2 reasoning via the language of thoughts that organizes the reasoning process as a causal sequence of mental language, or thoughts. Recently, it has been observed that System 2 reasoning can be elicited from Large Language Models (LLMs) pre-trained on large-scale natural languages. However, in this work, we show that there is a significant gap between the modeling of languages and thoughts. As language is primarily a tool for humans to share knowledge and thinking, modeling human language can easily absorb language biases into LLMs deviated from the chain of thoughts in minds. Furthermore, we show that the biases will mislead the eliciting of "thoughts" in LLMs to focus only on a biased part of the premise. To this end, we propose a new prompt technique termed Language-of-Thoughts (LoT) to demonstrate and alleviate this gap. Instead of directly eliciting the chain of thoughts from partial information, LoT instructs LLMs to adjust the order and token used for the expressions of all the relevant information. We show that the simple strategy significantly reduces the language modeling biases in LLMs and improves the performance of LLMs across a variety of reasoning tasks.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑