arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2505.03434cs.AIcs.LG
收藏

程序性记忆并非万能:弥合基于大语言模型的智能体的认知差距

Procedural Memory Is Not All You Need: Bridging Cognitive Gaps in LLM-Based Agents

aampe

Schaun Wheeler, Olivier Jeunen

AI总结:

本文指出LLMs仅依赖程序性记忆难以应对复杂多变环境,提出通过模块化架构融合语义记忆与联想学习,以构建具备自适应智能的智能体。

摘要:

大语言模型(LLMs)是人工智能(AI)领域的一项里程碑式成就,在文本生成、代码补全和对话连贯性等程序性任务中展现出前所未有的熟练度。这些能力源于其架构,该架构模拟了人类的程序性记忆——即大脑通过练习自动化重复性、模式驱动型任务的能力。然而,随着LLMs越来越多地被部署到现实世界应用中,它们在复杂、不可预测环境中运行的局限性已不容忽视。本文认为,LLMs虽然具有变革性,但其对程序性记忆的依赖从根本上构成了限制。为了创建能够在“棘手”学习环境中导航的智能体——在这些环境中规则不断变化、反馈模糊不清、新颖性成为常态——我们必须用语义记忆和联想学习系统来增强LLMs。通过采用将上述认知功能解耦的模块化架构,我们可以弥合狭窄的程序性专业知识与现实世界问题解决所需的自适应智能之间的差距。

英文摘要:

Large Language Models (LLMs) represent a landmark achievement in Artificial Intelligence (AI), demonstrating unprecedented proficiency in procedural tasks such as text generation, code completion, and conversational coherence. These capabilities stem from their architecture, which mirrors human procedural memory -- the brain's ability to automate repetitive, pattern-driven tasks through practice. However, as LLMs are increasingly deployed in real-world applications, it becomes impossible to ignore their limitations operating in complex, unpredictable environments. This paper argues that LLMs, while transformative, are fundamentally constrained by their reliance on procedural memory. To create agents capable of navigating ``wicked'' learning environments -- where rules shift, feedback is ambiguous, and novelty is the norm -- we must augment LLMs with semantic memory and associative learning systems. By adopting a modular architecture that decouples these cognitive functions, we can bridge the gap between narrow procedural expertise and the adaptive intelligence required for real-world problem-solving.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑