arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2504.10020cs.CLcs.AIcs.CV

性能提升的幻象:为何对比解码无法减轻多模态大语言模型中的对象幻觉?

The Mirage of Performance Gains: Why Contrastive Decoding Fails to Mitigate Object Hallucinations in MLLMs?

University of Science and Technology of China(中国科学技术大学);Eastern Institute of Technology, Ningbo(宁波东部技术研究所)

Hao Yin, Guangzong Si, Zilei Wang

AI总结:

本文研究了对比解码方法在减轻多模态大语言模型(MLLMs)中对象幻觉方面的有效性,发现其性能提升主要源于两个误导性因素,挑战了对比解码策略的有效性。

摘要:

对比解码策略被广泛用于减少多模态大语言模型(MLLMs)中的对象幻觉。这些方法通过构建对比样本来诱导幻觉,然后在输出分布中抑制它们。然而,本文证明此类方法无法有效缓解幻觉问题。在POPE基准测试中观察到的性能提升主要由两个误导性因素驱动:(1)对模型输出分布的粗略、单向调整;(2)自适应可能性约束,将采样策略简化为贪婪搜索。为进一步说明这些问题,我们引入了一系列虚假改进方法,并将其性能与对比解码技术进行评估。实验结果揭示了对比解码中观察到的性能提升与其缓解幻觉的初衷无关。我们的发现挑战了对比解码策略有效性的常见假设,并为开发真正有效的MLLMs幻觉解决方案铺平了道路。

英文摘要:

Contrastive decoding strategies are widely used to reduce object hallucinations in multimodal large language models (MLLMs). These methods work by constructing contrastive samples to induce hallucinations and then suppressing them in the output distribution. However, this paper demonstrates that such approaches fail to effectively mitigate the hallucination problem. The performance improvements observed on POPE Benchmark are largely driven by two misleading factors: (1) crude, unidirectional adjustments to the model's output distribution and (2) the adaptive plausibility constraint, which reduces the sampling strategy to greedy search. To further illustrate these issues, we introduce a series of spurious improvement methods and evaluate their performance against contrastive decoding techniques. Experimental results reveal that the observed performance gains in contrastive decoding are entirely unrelated to its intended goal of mitigating hallucinations. Our findings challenge common assumptions about the effectiveness of contrastive decoding strategies and pave the way for developing genuinely effective solutions to hallucinations in MLLMs.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑