arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2506.13130cs.CVcs.AIcs.CL

ZINA:多模态细粒度幻觉检测与编辑

ZINA: Multimodal Fine-grained Hallucination Detection and Editing

Keio AI Research Center(庆应义塾大学人工智能研究中心);Keio University(庆应义塾大学);Carnegie Mellon University(卡内基梅隆大学)

Yuiga Wada, Kazuki Matsuda, Komei Sugiura, Graham Neubig

AI总结:

本文提出ZINA方法,用于多模态大语言模型的细粒度幻觉检测与编辑,通过构建VisionHall数据集验证了其在检测和编辑任务中的优越性。

摘要:

多模态大语言模型(MLLMs)常生成幻觉,即输出偏离视觉内容。鉴于幻觉形式多样,检测细粒度幻觉对全面评估和分析至关重要。为此,我们提出多模态细粒度幻觉检测与编辑任务,并提出ZINA方法,该方法可识别幻觉片段,将其错误类型分为六类,并建议适当修正。为训练和评估该任务,我们构建了VisionHall数据集,包含来自十二个MLLMs的6900个手动标注输出和20000个通过图基方法生成的合成样本。我们证明ZINA在检测和编辑任务中优于现有方法,包括GPT-4o和Llama-3.2。

英文摘要:

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) often generate hallucinations, where the output deviates from the visual content. Given that these hallucinations can take diverse forms, detecting hallucinations at a fine-grained level is essential for comprehensive evaluation and analysis. To this end, we propose a novel task of multimodal fine-grained hallucination detection and editing for MLLMs. Moreover, we propose ZINA, a novel method that identifies hallucinated spans at a fine-grained level, classifies their error types into six categories, and suggests appropriate refinements. To train and evaluate models for this task, we construct VisionHall, a dataset comprising 6.9k outputs from twelve MLLMs manually annotated by 211 annotators, and 20k synthetic samples generated using a graph-based method that captures dependencies among error types. We demonstrated that ZINA outperformed existing methods, including GPT-4o and Llama-3.2, in both detection and editing tasks.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑