arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2503.12349cs.AI
收藏

SPIN-Bench:大型语言模型在战略规划与社会推理方面表现如何?

SPIN-Bench: How Well Do LLMs Plan Strategically and Reason Socially?

Princeton University(普林斯顿大学);The University of Texas at Austin(德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校);Sentient Foundation(Sentient基金会)

Jianzhu Yao, Kevin Wang, Ryan Hsieh, Haisu Zhou, Tianqing Zou, Zerui Cheng, Zhangyang Wang, Pramod Viswanath

AI总结:

本文提出SPIN-Bench,一个统一多领域基准,用于评估LLM在战略规划与社会推理中的表现,发现其在深度多跳推理和不确定性下协调方面存在显著瓶颈。

摘要:

社会互动中的推理和战略行为是智能的标志。这种推理形式远比静态环境中的孤立规划或推理任务(如数学问题求解)复杂得多。在本文中,我们提出了战略规划、互动与谈判基准(SPIN-Bench),这是一个新的多领域评估框架,旨在衡量战略规划和社会推理的智能水平。虽然许多现有基准侧重于狭窄的规划或单智能体推理,但SPIN-Bench将经典PDDL任务、竞争性棋盘游戏、合作性卡牌游戏和多智能体谈判场景统一在一个框架中。该框架既包含基准测试,也包含一个竞技场,用于模拟和评估各种社会情境,以测试AI智能体的推理和战略行为。我们通过系统地改变动作空间、状态复杂度和交互智能体数量来构建SPIN-Bench基准,以模拟各种社会情境,在这些情境中,成功不仅依赖于有条不紊的逐步决策,还依赖于对其他(对抗性或合作性)参与者的概念性推断。我们的实验表明,尽管当代大型语言模型在基本事实检索和短期规划方面表现尚可,但在需要跨大状态空间进行深度多跳推理以及在不确定性下进行社交协调的任务中,它们遇到了显著的性能瓶颈。我们期望SPIN-Bench能够推动未来在鲁棒多智能体规划、社会推理和人机协作方面的研究。项目网站:https://spinbench.github.io/

英文摘要:

Reasoning and strategic behavior in social interactions is a hallmark of intelligence. This form of reasoning is significantly more sophisticated than isolated planning or reasoning tasks in static settings (e.g., math problem solving). In this paper, we present Strategic Planning, Interaction, and Negotiation (SPIN-Bench), a new multi-domain evaluation designed to measure the intelligence of strategic planning and social reasoning. While many existing benchmarks focus on narrow planning or single-agent reasoning, SPIN-Bench combines classical PDDL tasks, competitive board games, cooperative card games, and multi-agent negotiation scenarios in one unified framework. The framework includes both a benchmark as well as an arena to simulate and evaluate the variety of social settings to test reasoning and strategic behavior of AI agents. We formulate the benchmark SPIN-Bench by systematically varying action spaces, state complexity, and the number of interacting agents to simulate a variety of social settings where success depends on not only methodical and step-wise decision making, but also conceptual inference of other (adversarial or cooperative) participants. Our experiments reveal that while contemporary LLMs handle basic fact retrieval and short-range planning reasonably well, they encounter significant performance bottlenecks in tasks requiring deep multi-hop reasoning over large state spaces and socially adept coordination under uncertainty. We envision SPIN-Bench as a catalyst for future research on robust multi-agent planning, social reasoning, and human--AI teaming. Project Website: https://spinbench.github.io/

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑