arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2503.04644cs.CLcs.IR
收藏

IFIR:一个用于评估专业领域信息检索中指令遵循的综合基准

IFIR: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Instruction-Following in Expert-Domain Information Retrieval

School of Advanced Interdisciplinary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences(中国科学院大学先进交叉科学学院);Chongqing Institute of Green and Intelligent Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences(中国科学院重庆绿色智能技术研究院);Zhejiang University(浙江大学);Yale University(耶鲁大学)

Tingyu Song, Guo Gan, Mingsheng Shang, Yilun Zhao

AI总结:

本文提出IFIR基准,包含2,426个高质量示例覆盖四个专业领域,通过不同复杂度指令评估信息检索模型的指令遵循能力,并提出基于LLM的评估方法,实验表明当前15个前沿模型在复杂领域指令遵循上存在显著挑战。

摘要:

我们介绍了IFIR,这是首个旨在评估专业领域中指令遵循信息检索(IR)的综合基准。IFIR包含2,426个高质量示例,涵盖四个专业领域(金融、法律、医疗和科学文献)的八个子集。每个子集针对一个或多个领域特定检索任务,重现了定制指令至关重要的真实场景。IFIR通过纳入不同复杂度级别的指令,实现了对指令遵循检索能力的详细分析。我们还提出了一种新颖的基于LLM的评估方法,以更精确可靠地评估模型在遵循指令方面的性能。通过对15个前沿检索模型(包括基于LLM的模型)进行广泛实验,结果表明当前模型在有效遵循复杂领域特定指令方面面临重大挑战。我们进一步提供深入分析以揭示这些局限性,为未来检索器开发的进展提供有价值的见解。

英文摘要:

We introduce IFIR, the first comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate instruction-following information retrieval (IR) in expert domains. IFIR includes 2,426 high-quality examples and covers eight subsets across four specialized domains: finance, law, healthcare, and science literature. Each subset addresses one or more domain-specific retrieval tasks, replicating real-world scenarios where customized instructions are critical. IFIR enables a detailed analysis of instruction-following retrieval capabilities by incorporating instructions at different levels of complexity. We also propose a novel LLM-based evaluation method to provide a more precise and reliable assessment of model performance in following instructions. Through extensive experiments on 15 frontier retrieval models, including those based on LLMs, our results reveal that current models face significant challenges in effectively following complex, domain-specific instructions. We further provide in-depth analyses to highlight these limitations, offering valuable insights to guide future advancements in retriever development.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑