arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2502.14883cs.CVcs.AI

盲人和低视力者如何偏好大型视觉-语言模型生成的场景描述

How Blind and Low-Vision Individuals Prefer Large Vision-Language Model-Generated Scene Descriptions

Na Min An, Eunki Kim, Wan Ju Kang, Sangryul Kim, James Thorne, Hyunjung Shim

AI总结:

研究探讨了盲人和低视力用户对大型视觉-语言模型生成场景描述的偏好,通过用户研究评估了六种描述类型,发现用户对描述的充分性和简洁性存在较大差异,提出需构建以盲人和低视力用户为中心的评估指标。

摘要:

对于盲人或低视力(BLV)个体而言, navigating 复杂环境可能带来严重风险。大型视觉-语言模型(LVLMs)在生成场景描述方面显示出潜力,但其对BLV用户的有效性仍缺乏深入研究。为填补这一空白,我们进行了八名BLV参与者的用户研究,系统评估了六种类型的LVLM描述。尽管这些描述有助于减少恐惧并提高可操作性,但用户评分显示充分性和简洁性存在较大差异。此外,GPT-4o尽管在优化描述方面有强大潜力,但并未被所有参与者一致偏好。我们利用用户研究获得的洞察来构建训练数据,以建立新的自动评估指标,以有效捕捉BLV的偏好。我们的发现强调了迫切需要以BLV为中心的评估指标和人机协同反馈,以提升LVLM描述质量,促进可及性。

英文摘要:

For individuals with blindness or low vision (BLV), navigating complex environments can pose serious risks. Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) show promise for generating scene descriptions, but their effectiveness for BLV users remains underexplored. To address this gap, we conducted a user study with eight BLV participants to systematically evaluate preferences for six types of LVLM descriptions. While they helped to reduce fear and improve actionability, user ratings showed wide variation in sufficiency and conciseness. Furthermore, GPT-4o--despite its strong potential to refine descriptions--was not consistently preferred by participants. We use the insights obtained from the user study to build training data for building our new automatic evaluation metric that can capture BLV preferences effectively. Our findings underscore the urgent need for BLV-centered evaluation metrics and human-in-the-loop feedback to advance LVLM description quality for accessibility.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑