arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2510.00766cs.CVcs.AI

大视觉-语言模型是否准备好指导盲人和低视力者?

Are Large Vision-Language Models Ready to Guide Blind and Low-Vision Individuals?

SKT;KAIST AI(韩国科学技术院人工智能);NAVER;Theia Insights

Eunki Kim, Na Min An, Wan Ju Kang, Sangryul Kim, James Thorne, Hyunjung Shim

AI总结:

本文提出统一框架,通过用户研究和定制数据集,开发出更高效的评估器,提升大视觉-语言模型在盲人和低视力用户导航中的应用性能。

摘要:

大视觉-语言模型(LVLMs)展示了协助盲人或低视力(BLV)个体的有前途的方向。然而,测量其在真实场景中的真正效用具有挑战性,因为评估其描述是否BLV信息性需要与评估标准场景描述根本不同的方法。尽管

英文摘要:

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) demonstrate a promising direction for assisting individuals with blindness or low-vision (BLV). Yet, measuring their true utility in real-world scenarios is challenging because evaluating whether their descriptions are BLV-informative requires a fundamentally different approach from assessing standard scene descriptions. While the "VLM-as-a-metric" or "LVLM-as-a-judge" paradigm has emerged, existing evaluators still fall short of capturing the unique requirements of BLV-centric evaluation, lacking at least one of the following key properties: (1) High correlation with human judgments, (2) Long instruction understanding, (3) Score generation efficiency, and (4) Multi-dimensional assessment. To this end, we propose a unified framework to bridge the gap between automated evaluation and actual BLV needs. First, we conduct an in-depth user study with BLV participants to understand and quantify their navigational preferences, curating VL-GUIDEDATA, a large-scale BLV user-simulated preference dataset containing image-request-response-score pairs. We then leverage the dataset to develop an accessibility-aware evaluator, VL-GUIDE-S, which outperforms existing (L)VLM judges in both human alignment and inference efficiency. Notably, its effectiveness extends beyond a single domain, demonstrating strong performance across multiple fine-grained, BLV-critical dimensions. We hope our work lays as a foundation for automatic AI judges that advance safe, barrier-free navigation for BLV users.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑